... and the
prospect of a simple kde metapackage for easy installation for newbies seems
a farfetched dream.
I'll adopt meta-kde if Chris isn't taking it (it's currently orphaned,
though there's no wnpp bug AFAICT). If I don't hear otherwise in a few
days I'll fix it up and do a new
Some more questions :
http://www.gap-system.org/~gap/Info/faq.html#Obtain4
2.4: Are there RPMS or DEB files for Linux?
We would like to be able to offer source and binary distributions
packaged for the popular Linux package formats (Red Hat and Debian
mainly) but so far we have not been able to
Thanks for the offers, and obviously we can't stop you taking the released
version of GAP and repackaging it as you wish, but I think we'll take out
time and think through how we'd like to proceed on this one.
GAP is a big complicated piece of software (or set of pieces) and there are
lots of
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the offers, and obviously we can't stop you taking the
released
version of GAP and repackaging it as you wish, but I think we'll take
out
time and think through how we'd like to proceed on this one.
That is why I am asking. To be honest, I have a
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:49:09AM -0800, James Michael DuPont wrote:
Correct me if i am wrong
1. You do not support the current debian packaging
because there is no mention of it on the webpage.
2. You are not aware of how far it is, it seems to have 3.4 covered in
testing.
I think it
Your message dated Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:47:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#122460: fixed in c-cpp-reference 2.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
