Package: preferences
Version: 1.2.100-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
This package fails to build from source:
...
Installing the build-deps
-> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.18
2003/04/20 03:40:36 dancer Exp $
-> Considering debhelper (>> 4.1.0)
->
severity 240992 normal
thanks
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I might be mistaken, but isn't it so that currently, if you accidently
> have libktoblzcheck1-dev installed, the resulted binary is linked
> against it, and otherwise, it isn't?
>
> Then, isn't it true that this p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 240992 normal
Bug#240992: gnucash-hbci: Please link against libktoblzcheck1
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Your message dated 18 Aug 2004 12:25:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line now close it
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:10:13PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> GnuCash's HBCI module can do checking of account numbers if compiled
> against libktoblzcheck (by adding libktoblzcheck1-dev to the
> build-dependencies).
> Sounds like a useful and easy thing to me, I actually tested it, too.
I mi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package gnucash-hbci
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnucash-hbci
> retitle 177535 gnucash-hbci: Clarify description and add package suggestions
Bug#177535: Clarify description and add package suggestions
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 240992 gnuca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 249777 gnus-bonus-el
Bug#249777: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring
Bug reassigned from package `t-gnus' to `gnus-bonus-el'.
> tags 249777 + patch
Bug#249777: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring
Tags were:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #hmm, why does it say the retitle worked when severity didn't...
> package gnucash-hbci
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnucash-hbci
> severity 240992 wishlist
Bug#240992: Please link against libktoblzcheck1
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> retitle 240992
package gnucash
severity 240992 wishlist
retitle 240992 Please link against libktoblzcheck1
thanks
Hi.
This is a feature request, I'm retiteling it and adjusting the severity.
GnuCash's HBCI module can do checking of account numbers if compiled
against libktoblzcheck (by adding libktoblzcheck1-de
retitle 177535 Clarify description and add package suggestions
thanks
Hi.
I suggest to change
[GnuCash description]
.
This package adds support for hbci, a home banking standard used in
Germany.
to
Description: HBCI (Homebanking Computer Interface) module for GnuCash
This GnuCash addon pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package gnucash
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnucash
> severity 240992 wishlist
Bug number 240992 belongs to package gnucash-hbci, skipping.
> retitle 240992 Please link against libktoblzcheck1
Bug#240992: gnucash-hbci module depends on libktoblzche
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 177535 Clarify description and add package suggestions
Bug#177535: gnucash-hbci: description improvement
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
empiy nammoo ucorqxw unhuvjtk cwcygq
Do you know that the con g r ess. just
passed a new law and you can
tgrqngyd Rfpjpeardc ibvschdi kyocs
r e f
inance your - mo.
r t gage with Z ER O. ra
t e?
akxaj Rbvpzc chgalzaj fnjivqt otzqz mnhgp
More then 300 , 000 families used
this offer last month.
On August 18, 2004 at 4:08PM +0200,
Laurent.Bonnaud (at inpg.fr) wrote:
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> gnus-bonus-el
> Here is the /tmp/elc_VSpcM6.log logfile:
>
> emacs20 -q -no-site-file --no-site-file -batch -l path.el -f
> batch-byte-compile gnus-eyecandy.el gnus-filterhist.
On sam, 2004-08-07 at 22:18 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I have just done the following with no problems:
>
> # apt-get remove gnus-bonus-el gnus
> # apt-get install semi wl t-gnus
> # apt-get install gnus-bonus-el
>
> with no errors at all.
>
> Perhaps this was fixed in a release after t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 249777
Bug#249777: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 249777 normal
Bug#249777: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring
Severity set to `normal'.
> --
Stopping pr
sorry...
I wrote a few minutes ago about a problem "login.app"
The package version is
1.2.1-18
Best wishes, Andre
Hi,
I installed yesterday Debain Linux Sarge.
I saw, the package "login.app" (for wmaker) wrote in zje start-sequence
"xpm - file broken or corrupt"
The X didn't start coreectly.
I found, you forgot to include the file
/usr/share/Login.app/Panel.xpm
I copied it from an older package.
Best
another spread a jacket under her little feet to keep them from the the surgeon places in the middle of the wound pieces of skin snipped into the Union an organic or a political people at all When
out There are two passages in Sun Tzu in which he alludes to the clavichord As soon as Nichol
If you haven't seen it yet, please check out http://www.imimic.com for more
information on our Reactor(tm) software that can improve the web for users and
administrators. If we find that "Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])" is
a subject we can help you with, we'll reply as soon as possi
Accepted:
mmake_2.2.1-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-5.diff.gz
mmake_2.2.1-5.dsc
to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-5.dsc
mmake_2.2.1-5_all.deb
to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-5_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 261581
Thank you for your
Hello
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:53:37AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well well. I assume of non-serious priority right?
> > I did a random check of tree packages. 2 of them was correct and 1 did
> > not include such source comments (hsftp).
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tmp/mmake-2.2.1$ cat LICENSE
> COPYRIGHT GNUGPL (c) 1998-2001 Jan-Henrik Haukeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Redistribution and use with or without modification, are permitted
> provided that the above copyright notice can be rep
mmake_2.2.1-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mmake_2.2.1-5.dsc
mmake_2.2.1-5.diff.gz
mmake_2.2.1-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:53:37AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well well. I assume of non-serious priority right?
> > I did a random check of tree packages. 2 of them was correct and 1 did
> > not include such source comments (hsftp).
>
> It
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well well. I assume of non-serious priority right?
> I did a random check of tree packages. 2 of them was correct and 1 did
> not include such source comments (hsftp).
It depends on the particular case.
> That he removed GNUGPL.TXT and LICENSE and adde
Hello
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:46:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > associated with the copyrights in the actual source files, and that's
> > > what actually matters. I wish it were not so, but thus it is. We
> > > cannot tell from that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 255955 upstream contain copying documents but not as comments in
> source code files
Bug#255955: mmake does not include a copyright file that actually includes the
copyright of mmake
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
28 matches
Mail list logo
