rep-xmms_0.4-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: rep-xmms_0.4-5.dsc to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/rep-xmms_0.4-5.dsc rep-xmms_0.4-5.tar.gz to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/rep-xmms_0.4-5.tar.gz rep-xmms_0.4-5_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/rep-xmms_0.4-5_i386.deb sawfish-xmms_0.4-5_all.deb to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/sawfish-xmms_0.4-5_all.deb

Processing of rep-xmms_0.4-5_i386.changes

2006-03-07 Thread Archive Administrator
rep-xmms_0.4-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rep-xmms_0.4-5.dsc rep-xmms_0.4-5.tar.gz rep-xmms_0.4-5_i386.deb sawfish-xmms_0.4-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Bug#152128: vcg: xvcg dies with segfault when opening a vcg file

2006-03-07 Thread Matej Vela
tag 152128 patch thanks Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Trying to open a vcg file causes a segfault. [...] I think I've tracked this down to a memory overrun in src/X11dev.c. Does the attached patch work for you? Thanks, Matej --- vcg-1.30debian.orig/src/X11dev.c +++ vcg-1.30deb

Processed: Re: vcg: xvcg dies with segfault when opening a vcg file

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 152128 patch Bug#152128: vcg: xvcg dies with segfault when opening a vcg file There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#355788: vcg: pbm tools are useless

2006-03-07 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:40:46PM +0100, Ahmed Baizid wrote: > Package: vcg > Severity: wishlist > > VCG comes with pbm utilities. > The ImageMagick suite does a better job, I am sure. > vcg debian package should not ship these three utilities. I notice the same, but didn't test it. I suspect h

Bug#355462: vcg: missing binary or extra manpage; extra dir

2006-03-07 Thread James Michael DuPont
Hi, I intend on picking up on maintainence of VCG, but I dont have the time atm. I have rewritten portions of the uglified code and plan on doing more. mike --- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW; Matej suggests that vcg is likely going to be removed from the > archive unless someone a

Bug#355462: vcg: missing binary or extra manpage; extra dir

2006-03-07 Thread Justin Pryzby
> --- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW; Matej suggests that vcg is likely going to be removed from the > > archive unless someone adopts it. I think its interesting software, > > but I don't consider myself a user, or a prospective maintainer. On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:39:03PM -0

Bug#355788: vcg: pbm tools are useless

2006-03-07 Thread Ahmed Baizid
Package: vcg Severity: wishlist VCG comes with pbm utilities. The ImageMagick suite does a better job, I am sure. vcg debian package should not ship these three utilities. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture:

Processed: tagging 270899

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > tags 270899 - patch Bug#270899: build system doesn't notice when install/strip fails Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#355462: vcg: missing binary or extra manpage; extra dir

2006-03-07 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:51:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:26:03 -0500 Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On i386, there are manpages for both vcg and xvcg, both included in > > full, but there is no /usr/bin/vcg. Is it missing, or is the manpage > > "e

Bug#355462: vcg: missing binary or extra manpage; extra dir

2006-03-07 Thread ahmed
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:26:03 -0500 Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On i386, there are manpages for both vcg and xvcg, both included in > full, but there is no /usr/bin/vcg. Is it missing, or is the manpage > "extra"? If both manpages remain, one should probably be a symlink, > or use t

Bug#279454: marked as done (please rebuild with libcurl3-dev as build dependency)

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:19:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#279454: fixed in wmget 0.6.0-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#347081: marked as done (wmget: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:17:18 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347081: fixed in wmget 0.6.0-1.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#322539: marked as done (yaboot: FTBFS: label at end of compound statement)

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:15:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322539: fixed in yaboot 1.3.13-4.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tripwire/tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7.diff.gz tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7.dsc to pool/main/t/tripwire/tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7.dsc tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tripwire/tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.d

dcgui_0.80-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: dcgui_0.80-5.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dcgui/dcgui_0.80-5.diff.gz dcgui_0.80-5.dsc to pool/main/d/dcgui/dcgui_0.80-5.dsc dcgui_0.80-5_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dcgui/dcgui_0.80-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 335747 Thank you for your cont

Bug#335747: marked as done (Please use gnutls12 instead of gnutls11)

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:47:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335747: fixed in dcgui 0.80-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350949: marked as done (tripwire [INTL] Portuguese translation for debconf's messages)

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350949: fixed in tripwire 2.3.1.2.0-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#334546: marked as done (tripwire: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334546: fixed in tripwire 2.3.1.2.0-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processing of dcgui_0.80-5_i386.changes

2006-03-07 Thread Archive Administrator
dcgui_0.80-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dcgui_0.80-5.dsc dcgui_0.80-5.diff.gz dcgui_0.80-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Processing of tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7_i386.changes

2006-03-07 Thread Archive Administrator
tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7.dsc tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7.diff.gz tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-7_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

goobox_0.9.93-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: goobox_0.9.93-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/goobox/goobox_0.9.93-2.diff.gz goobox_0.9.93-2.dsc to pool/main/g/goobox/goobox_0.9.93-2.dsc goobox_0.9.93-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/goobox/goobox_0.9.93-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 355247 Th

Bug#355247: marked as done (goobox: trying to overwrite /var/lib/scrollkeeper/vi/scrollkeeper_cl.xml)

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:02:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355247: fixed in goobox 0.9.93-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processing of goobox_0.9.93-2_i386.changes

2006-03-07 Thread Archive Administrator
goobox_0.9.93-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: goobox_0.9.93-2.dsc goobox_0.9.93-2.diff.gz goobox_0.9.93-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#152128: patch

2006-03-07 Thread Matej Vela
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If #152128 is reproducible with the unobfuscated source but not with > the obfuscated one, upstream must have provided slightly different > versions... Nope, #152128 is reproducible with vcg.20050204 as well as long as it's compiled with -O2. Cheers, Mat

Bug#152128: patch

2006-03-07 Thread Matej Vela
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A patch fixing most of these bugs is attached; there seems to be a new > upstream release from 2005 which I'm working on, which also fixes the > grave "crashes no matter what bug #152128. The only significant change between vcg_1.30.orig.tar.gz (the old