Bug#347958: Fails to establish pppoe connection

On Jul 24, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then, this pppoeconf bug will be closed (or reassign to ppp > package if you want) except you have new informations for Don't. This behaviour is a feature. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processing of htdig_3.2.0b6-1_i386.changes

htdig_3.2.0b6-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: htdig_3.2.0b6-1.dsc htdig_3.2.0b6.orig.tar.gz htdig_3.2.0b6-1.diff.gz htdig-doc_3.2.0b6-1_all.deb htdig_3.2.0b6-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Bug#347958: Fails to establish pppoe connection

Hi, >> Looks like you did not already configure your ethernet >> connection and pppoeconf is not correctly configuring >> /etc/network/interfaces to raise eth1 before starting the PPP >> connections. I have seen a similar bug in the pppoeconf >> package in the latest Ubuntu release, but I do not

Bug#348537: does not remove rule generated by ip-up.d/0clampmss on ip-down

Hi, > The problem is, that my DSL-connection is reset once every 24 > hours so this roule get added once a day, but actually not > removed when the connection is lost -- an apropiate rule in > /etc/ppp/ip-down.d does not exist. File '/etc/ppp/ip-down.d/0clampmss' is created with pppoconf (even wi

Bug#379497: libjpeg-mmx: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `ldmxcsr'

Package: libjpeg-mmx Version: 0.1.5-4 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of libjpeg-mmx_0.1.5-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 2006072

Re: Your mail

subscribe qa.debian.org keyword qa.debian.org + cvs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#379479: statdataml: FTBFS: Error: package 'XML' could not be loaded

Package: statdataml Version: 1.0.9-2 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of statdataml_1.0.9-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 20060722-0257 >

Bug#346390: ftpmirror: date handling problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i'm checking this bug and i can't reproce it, can you give more information about the problem? Please specify if you can see good the date from the Windows FTP Server. - -- - ~ghostbar @ linux/debian 'testing' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503

Bug#248470: marked as done (synopsis: Package new version)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:37:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#248470: fixed in synopsis 0.8.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processing of libunit++_1.2.3-5_i386.changes

libunit++_1.2.3-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libunit++_1.2.3-5.dsc libunit++_1.2.3-5.diff.gz libunit++-doc_1.2.3-5_all.deb libunit++-dev_1.2.3-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libunit++_1.2.3-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libunit++-dev_1.2.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libunit++/libunit++-dev_1.2.3-5_i386.deb libunit++-doc_1.2.3-5_all.deb to pool/main/libu/libunit++/libunit++-doc_1.2.3-5_all.deb libunit++_1.2.3-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libu/libunit++/libunit++_1.2.3-5.diff.gz libunit++_1.2.3-5.dsc

Bug#191302: marked as done (restartd: nice if stopped while upgrading)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 05:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191302: fixed in restartd 0.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processing of openmotif_2.2.3-1.5_i386.changes

openmotif_2.2.3-1.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openmotif_2.2.3-1.5.dsc openmotif_2.2.3.orig.tar.gz openmotif_2.2.3-1.5.diff.gz libmotif3_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb libmotif-dev_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb motif-clients_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb Greetings, Yo

openmotif_2.2.3-1.5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Warning: ignoring openmotif_2.2.3.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: libmotif-dev_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb to pool/non-free/o/openmotif/libmotif-dev_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb libmotif3_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb to pool/non-free/o/openmotif/libmotif3_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb motif-clients_2.2.3-1

Re: Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

Archive Administrator wrote: > Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in > the Debian upload queue directory: > openmotif_2.2.3-1.5.diff.gz > openmotif_2.2.3-1.5.dsc > openmotif_2.2.3.orig.tar.gz > This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job > cannot

Bug#281870: marked as done (FTBFS on Hurd)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:52:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#330049: marked as done (tla(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date config.sub/config.guess)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:52:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#348195: RM: kimberlite -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream

retitle 348195 RM: kimberlite -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream retitle 358043 RM: kimberlite -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream reassign 348195 ftp.debian.org reassign 358043 ftp.debian.org merge 348195 358043 thanks Please remove kimberlite. * Orphaned for 4 months. * Last upst

Processed: RM: kimberlite -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 348195 RM: kimberlite -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream Bug#348195: RM: kimberlite -- RoQA; unmaintained, unused, dead upstream Changed Bug title. > retitle 358043 RM: kimberlite -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream Bug#358043: O: ki

Bug#366728: marked as done (tla: FTBFS when using sudo: $(PWD) reset)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:04:07 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fix confirmed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Processed: RM: installwatch -- RoQA; merged into checkinstall

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 347469 RM: installwatch -- RoQA; merged into checkinstall Bug#347469: installwatch: merged with checkinstall but still in unstable Changed Bug title. > noowner 347469 Bug#347469: RM: installwatch -- RoQA; merged into checkinstall Removed annota

Bug#281870: Fix confirmed

Thanks for the fix, it is now integrated in the new version. Closing the bug :) https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/arch4debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#142696: marked as done (please name the library package according to policy recommendation)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:56:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#374348: marked as done (FTBFS on amd64: header problems)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:56:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t