Bug#417026: marked as done (depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#417026: fixed in remstats 1.0.13a-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

remstats_1.0.13a-8_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: remstats-bintools_1.0.13a-8_amd64.deb to pool/main/r/remstats/remstats-bintools_1.0.13a-8_amd64.deb remstats-doc_1.0.13a-8_all.deb to pool/main/r/remstats/remstats-doc_1.0.13a-8_all.deb remstats-servers_1.0.13a-8_all.deb to pool/main/r/remstats/remstats-servers_1.0.13a-8_all.deb re

Bug#392397: preparing a QA upload

Hi Marga, With xracer now orphaned, I want to prepare a QA upload that closes this bug. However, the diff attached to the bug report includes some anomalies; The faq.html and faq.txt files appear to have been patched when Makefile.am indicates that faq.chtml should be the source of faq.html and f

Processing of remstats_1.0.13a-8_amd64.changes

remstats_1.0.13a-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: remstats_1.0.13a-8.dsc remstats_1.0.13a-8.diff.gz remstats_1.0.13a-8_all.deb remstats-servers_1.0.13a-8_all.deb remstats-doc_1.0.13a-8_all.deb remstats-bintools_1.0.13a-8_amd64.deb Greetings,

Processing of le_1.9.1-5_i386.changes

le_1.9.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: le_1.9.1-5.dsc le_1.9.1-5.diff.gz le_1.9.1-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

le_1.9.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: le_1.9.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/l/le/le_1.9.1-5.diff.gz le_1.9.1-5.dsc to pool/main/l/le/le_1.9.1-5.dsc le_1.9.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/l/le/le_1.9.1-5_i386.deb Override entries for your package: le_1.9.1-5.dsc - source editors le_1.9.1-5_i386.deb - optional editors Announcing

ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12.diff.gz to pool/main/n/ncurses-hexedit/ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12.diff.gz ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12.dsc to pool/main/n/ncurses-hexedit/ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12.dsc ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12_i386.deb to pool/main/n/ncurses-hexedit/ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12_i386.d

vche_1.7.2-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: vche_1.7.2-7.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vche/vche_1.7.2-7.diff.gz vche_1.7.2-7.dsc to pool/main/v/vche/vche_1.7.2-7.dsc vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vche/vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb Override entries for your package: vche_1.7.2-7.dsc - source editors vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb - optiona

Processing of ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12_i386.changes

ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12.dsc ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12.diff.gz ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7-12_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#275846: marked as done (smarteiffel: New upstream version 2.0 available)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:15:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line New SmartEiffel uploaded has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Processing of vche_1.7.2-7_i386.changes

vche_1.7.2-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: vche_1.7.2-7.dsc vche_1.7.2-7.diff.gz vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Bug#417108: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes

El domingo, 1 de abril de 2007, Martin Michlmayr escribió: [...] > > You can reproduce this problem with gcc-snapshot from unstable. > > > Automatic build of aqsis_1.1.0.20050815-4 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49 > > ... > > > ia64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../libaqsistypes -g -O2 -M

Bug#324025: marked as done (aqsis: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:57:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324025: aqsis: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#217969: marked as done (aqsis always aborts)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:59:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#217969: aqsis always aborts has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re