Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 416159 pending Bug#416159: ITP: gurgitate-mail -- E-mail processor and filter with configuration files in ruby There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 421640 pending Bug#421640:

unifont_1.0-4_amd64.changes is NEW

(new) unifont-bin_1.0-4_all.deb optional x11 Miscellaneous utilities associated with unifont This package provides other utilities that are part of the unifont source package but are not necessary for using the font itself: . - unifont.hex: Unprocessed font in "hex" format - hexdraw: Produce

Processing of unifont_1.0-4_amd64.changes

unifont_1.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: unifont_1.0-4.dsc unifont_1.0-4.diff.gz unifont_1.0-4_all.deb unifont-bin_1.0-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Bug#218720: 404 error

tags 218720 moreinfo thanks Not there anymore it seems. Do you know where to find it? -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Processed: 404 error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 218720 moreinfo Bug#218720: Outdated version of unifont in Debian There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#421640: please provide unifont.hex

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Uhm, for an orphaned package, I suppose I have to do this myself. Are there > > any rules I should take into consideration before NMUing? > > Basically, all maintainers are encouraged to

Bug#421640: please provide unifont.hex

Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uhm, for an orphaned package, I suppose I have to do this myself. Are there > any rules I should take into consideration before NMUing? Basically, all maintainers are encouraged to do uploads on behalf of the QA Group, and you can treat it as a maintai

Bug#421640: please provide unifont.hex

Uhm, for an orphaned package, I suppose I have to do this myself. Are there any rules I should take into consideration before NMUing? Also, could someone please review my patch and tell me if it's ok? Using /usr/share/fonts seems like the right thing to me, but there aren't other packages addin