FYI: The status of the metacam source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2-2
Current version: 1.2-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To
FYI: The status of the toshset source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.72-2
Current version: 1.72-4
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
FYI: The status of the dome source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.80-3
Current version: 4.80-4
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To
FYI: The status of the le source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.9.1-4.1
Current version: 1.13.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292736: fixed in wmcalclock 1.25-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292735: fixed in wmcalclock 1.25-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> notfixed 417026 1.0.13a-8
Bug#417026: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Bug marked as not fixed in version 1.0.13a-8.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Matej Vela wrote:
severity 427639 wishlist
close 427639 netcdf/1:3.6.2-1
merge 219592 427639
thanks
Giacomo Mulas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I had to recompile the package from source to enable fortran90 support via
gfortran, why is it not enabled by default? It only requ
found 417026 1.0.13a-8
thanks
hi,
while re-running pipuarts on the packages which have marked their
bugs as fixed, your package failed again to remove because of having
non-essential depends in its postrm file:
Removing remstats ...
Purging configuration files for remstats ...
/var/lib/dpk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 417026 1.0.13a-8
Bug#417026: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.13a-8.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 427639 1:3.6.2-1
Bug#427639: netcdfg-dev: why no fortran 90 support via gfortran?
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1:3.6.2-1, send any further explanations to
Giacomo Mulas <[
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 427639 wishlist
Bug#427639: netcdfg-dev: why no fortran 90 support via gfortran?
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> close 427639 netcdf/1:3.6.2-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> merge 219592 427639
Bug#219592: For
Hello,
just an update:
recompiling the x11vnc testing sources (in the package
libvncserver-0.8.2) produces a working x11vnc.
(debuild binary didn't seem to work though, I had to do a simple make in
the x11vnc sources directory)
Sincerely,
Luca
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 09:57 +, Debi
severity 427639 wishlist
close 427639 netcdf/1:3.6.2-1
merge 219592 427639
thanks
Giacomo Mulas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had to recompile the package from source to enable fortran90 support via
> gfortran, why is it not enabled by default? It only required some trivial
> editing of debian/
Package: netcdfg-dev
Version: 3.6.1-1
Severity: normal
I had to recompile the package from source to enable fortran90 support via
gfortran, why is it not enabled by default? It only required some trivial
editing of debian/rules to get it to compile on x86_64 (i.e. setting the
fortran90 compiler a
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299354: fixed in freqtweak 0.7.0~cvs20070605-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: x11vnc
Version: 0.8.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since I upgraded my testing distribution to the last libc&xorg yesterday,
x11vnc from testing does not seem to work anymore.
When I run it, I can connect to the remote desktop but the on the local viewing
ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
