Bug#475980: caudium: FTBFS: mhash.c:28:26: error: caudium_util.h: No such file or directory

:1.4.9.1-5 / Mon Apr 14 01:26:01 +0200 2008 Automatic build of caudium_2:1.4.9.1-5 on bordereau-4.bordeaux.grid5000.fr by sbuild/amd64 0.57.0 Build started at 20080414-0126 ** Failed to open ./caudium_1.4.9.1-5.dsc

Bug#475977: ipband: FTBFS: ipband.h:264: error: expected identifier or '(' before '__extension__'

Package: ipband Version: 0.7.2-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#476048: netdude: FTBFS: checking for shared library run path origin... /bin/sh: ./config.rpath: No such file or directory

Package: netdude Version: 0.3.3-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#476060: edenmath.app: FTBFS: make: invalid option -- 2

Package: edenmath.app Version: 1.1.1a-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because

Bug#458635: marked as done (krecord: FTBFS: sound.h:45: error: expected `)' before '*' token)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:25:07 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line krecord has been removed from Debian, closing #458635 has caused the Debian Bug report #458635, regarding krecord: FTBFS: sound.h:45: error: expected `)' before '*' token to be marked as done.

JUE COCKTAIL S/CARGO E INGRESO FREE+SHOW+DISCO -VIE Y SAB CENA SHOW DISCO

Hola como estas ?? Esta semana en Acqua -Juana Manso 305-Pto madero No podes faltar a los mejores Jueves de Bs as Este Jueves cocktail SIN CARGO ( Pizzas, empanadas, Canapes, sandwiches) e INGRESO FREE desde las 22.30 hs para vos y tus amigos/as-te reservo un lugar para estar

Processing of gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes

gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.dsc gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

Rejected: No Checksums-sha1: field in .changes file Rejected: No Checksums-sha256: field in .changes file === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processing of gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes

gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.dsc gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

gtkglarea override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb: package says section is devel, override says libs. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the

gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gtkglarea/gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gtkglarea/gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gtkglarea/gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.dsc to

Processing of ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.changes

ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc ipband_0.7.2-5.diff.gz ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processed: forcibly merging 420272 255351

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25 forcemerge 420272 255351 Bug#420272: ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away Bug#255351: ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim Forcibly Merged 255351 420272. End of

ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ipband_0.7.2-5.diff.gz to pool/main/i/ipband/ipband_0.7.2-5.diff.gz ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc to pool/main/i/ipband/ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/i/ipband/ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.deb Override entries for your package: ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc - source net

Bug#420272: marked as done (ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#255351: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #255351, regarding ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#420272: marked as done (ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420272: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #420272, regarding ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#255351: marked as done (ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420272: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #420272, regarding ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#255351: marked as done (ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#255351: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #255351, regarding ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#475977: marked as done (ipband: FTBFS: ipband.h:264: error: expected identifier or '(' before '__extension__')

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#475977: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #475977, regarding ipband: FTBFS: ipband.h:264: error: expected identifier or '(' before '__extension__' to be marked as

Processing of selinux-basics_0.3.2_i386.changes

selinux-basics_0.3.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: selinux-basics_0.3.2.dsc selinux-basics_0.3.2.tar.gz selinux-basics_0.3.2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

selinux-basics_0.3.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: selinux-basics_0.3.2.dsc to pool/main/s/selinux-basics/selinux-basics_0.3.2.dsc selinux-basics_0.3.2.tar.gz to pool/main/s/selinux-basics/selinux-basics_0.3.2.tar.gz selinux-basics_0.3.2_all.deb to pool/main/s/selinux-basics/selinux-basics_0.3.2_all.deb Override entries for your

Bug#297712: marked as done (rtlinux doesn't seem prepared for kernel-package)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #297712 has caused the Debian Bug report #297712, regarding rtlinux doesn't seem prepared for kernel-package to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#297713: marked as done (INSTALL mentioned in README.Debian does not exist)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #297713 has caused the Debian Bug report #297713, regarding INSTALL mentioned in README.Debian does not exist to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#99590: marked as done (rtlinux: Missing symlinks for some man pages)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #99590 has caused the Debian Bug report #99590, regarding rtlinux: Missing symlinks for some man pages to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#297711: marked as done (New upstream version available)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #297711 has caused the Debian Bug report #297711, regarding New upstream version available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#146975: marked as done (rtlinux: error in doc-base file)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #146975 has caused the Debian Bug report #146975, regarding rtlinux: error in doc-base file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: htdig: Creates db files in /etc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 475885 + patch Bug#475885: htdig: Creates db files in /etc There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#475885: htdig: Creates db files in /etc

tags 475885 + patch thanks htdig, after installation, creates db files in /etc/htdig, with a total of 6M! Patch attached. Alas, there is no seperate ./configure flag for these types of files. Regards, -- Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#436770: marked as done (divine: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)on sid/i386)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:15:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line divine has been removed from Debian, closing #436770 has caused the Debian Bug report #436770, regarding divine: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)on sid/i386 to be marked as done.

Bug#122412: marked as done (Wish: init scripts)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:15:06 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line divine has been removed from Debian, closing #122412 has caused the Debian Bug report #122412, regarding Wish: init scripts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: caudium: FTBFS: mhash.c:28:26: error: caudium_util.h: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 475980 + patch Bug#475980: caudium: FTBFS: mhash.c:28:26: error: caudium_util.h: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#475980: caudium: FTBFS: mhash.c:28:26: error: caudium_util.h: No such file or directory

tags 475980 + patch thanks Patch attached. Regards, -- Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 0x634F9A20 diff -urNad caudium-1.4.9.1.orig/src/cmods/module_makefile.in