Actu-shop vous propose de tirer avantage des nouveautés de son partenaire Les
3suisses.
--
Bonjour,
c'est la rentrée avec les 3suisses et c'est le moment de faire les derniers
préparatifs ! Les 3suisses vous offre
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:02:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#451540: fixed in tgif 1:4.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #451540,
regarding tgif: pstoepsi can't detect non-".ps" file with paths
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Hello:
I am in the process of adopting tgif and I would like to know if this bug
is still present. I have not yet found a case where pstoepsi fails and
if you have one, I would appreciate trying it.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
pstoepsi does not work. Here is a patch:
-
hello:
I am about to adopt tgif and I would like to know if this bug is still
present in the current version of tgif. Please see below for more
information:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
Two separate bugs, apparently, but who knows the misterious ways of
software bugs? To
Hello
I am about to adopt tgif and I wanted to know if this bug has been
resolved to your satisfaction. Please see below for more information.
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Toni Mueller wrote:
the program pstoepsi is broken in several ways:
- When using the option "-2x", checking for the source
FYI: The status of the powerprefs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.5.1-2
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint fi
FYI: The status of the pload source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.5-4
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files.
FYI: The status of the arch-buildpackage source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.1-5
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hi
Package: thttpd
Version: 2.25b-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
php-cgi needs SCRIPT_FILENAME environement variable to be defined to
detects it was invoqued as CGI script. It is not CGI compliant, but it
was writen like this. Here is a little patch which defines this
environment variable and take ca
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:35:18 +0200
with message-id <20100901143518.gz12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #582535,
regarding (kcemirror_0.1.5-3/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:35:18 +0200
with message-id <20100901143518.gz12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #487123,
regarding kcemirror: Add dh_icons to debian/rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:35:18 +0200
with message-id <20100901143518.gz12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #385136,
regarding kcemirror: installs invalid screensnap.exe on compaq aero 1520
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20100901140732.gw12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #298530,
regarding knetfilter: No manpages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20100901140732.gw12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #582538,
regarding (knetfilter_3.5.0-2/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20100901140732.gw12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #348608,
regarding knetfilter: shouldn't /usr/share/applications be used instead of
/usr/share/applnk for deskt
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:01:51 +0200
with message-id <20100901140151.gt12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #394611,
regarding tar options for building .orig.tar.gz are hardcoded
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:01:51 +0200
with message-id <20100901140151.gt12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #322910,
regarding arch-recordpackage: please allow removal of --patch-X suffix
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:01:51 +0200
with message-id <20100901140151.gt12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #304551,
regarding please allow options to reference environment variables
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:01:51 +0200
with message-id <20100901140151.gt12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #324135,
regarding arch-buildpackage: Does not exclude {arch} or .arch-id dirs when
building
to be marked as do
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:48:27 +0200
with message-id <20100901134827.gp12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #400452,
regarding Build with libxaw7; NMU diff
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:48:27 +0200
with message-id <20100901134827.gp12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #402473,
regarding Graphs in pload mangled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:40:56 +0200
with message-id <20100901134056.gl12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #509990,
regarding galrey: Please add fallback dependency on
graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:39:03 +0200
with message-id <20100901133903.gk12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #585236,
regarding imgseek: Python string exceptions no more allowed in Python 2.6
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:39:03 +0200
with message-id <20100901133903.gk12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #415948,
regarding imgseek: builds with -O2 even with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="noopt"
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:39:03 +0200
with message-id <20100901133903.gk12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #397554,
regarding imgseek: main window has too large minimum height
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:39:03 +0200
with message-id <20100901133903.gk12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #390021,
regarding imgseek: Segmentation fault when searching for images.
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:39:03 +0200
with message-id <20100901133903.gk12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #331530,
regarding imgSeek doesnt start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #92006,
regarding Problems swapping over NFS.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #483802,
regarding swapd: wrong description regarding swap file/partition differences
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #248831,
regarding New version is available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #328491,
regarding swapd: failure to remove /swap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #364238,
regarding swapd: not working if no real swap in system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #372552,
regarding swapd: README.Debian needs updating since MAX_SWAPFILES is declared
differently now in swap.
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #202936,
regarding swapd: doesn'n allocate any swap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #248831,
regarding swapd: new version 1.0.2 is available (and actually works)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #189418,
regarding swapd: freemem() should be multiplied by 1024 before return.
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #248831,
regarding swapd: new version 0.3.2 is available (development resumed)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #227257,
regarding swapd: freemem() function should account only 'MemFree' and
'SwapFree' numbers, not 'Buffers
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:36:06 +0200
with message-id <20100901133606.gj12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #189415,
regarding swapd: freemem() function changed in unexpected way
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:32:40 +0200
with message-id <20100901133240.gi12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #481916,
regarding RFP: MMA -- Musical Midi Accompaniment generator
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:32:40 +0200
with message-id <20100901133240.gi12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #341684,
regarding New upstream version 1.0 available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:32:40 +0200
with message-id <20100901133240.gi12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #344170,
regarding mma: include emacs mode
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:30:28 +0200
with message-id <20100901133028.gh12...@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #337608,
regarding aap: AAP cannot determine installation directory of itself.
to be marked as done.
This means
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
galrey |1.0.2-4 | source, all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned for long time, unused, dead upstream, alternatives exist
---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
mma | 0.12-2 | source, all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; unused, orphaned for a long time, dead upstream
--
N
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
aap |1.091-1 | source, all
aap-doc |1.091-1 | all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned, low popcon, no rdepends, alternatives
---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
imgseek |0.8.6-4 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386,
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
--- Reason --
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
swapd | 0.2-11 | source, alpha, amd64, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
s390, sparc
swapd | 0.2-11+b1 | hppa, ia64
swapd | 0.2-11+b2 | armel
--- Reason --
Не платит страховая компания? Обращайтесь к нам
8 (967)145-69-62
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100901095150.8elk5706...@zej.ua
49 matches
Mail list logo
