Package: timidity
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: linux-any
The debian/control file in timidity uses a negated list of architectures
to specify a package relationship (most likely Build-Depends) on a
Linux-specific package. I.e. something like:
Build-Depends: li
Accepted:
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/m/mgp/mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.debian.tar.gz
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.dsc
to main/m/mgp/mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.dsc
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3_amd64.deb
to main/m/mgp/mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3_amd64.deb
Overri
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.dsc
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.debian.tar.gz
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.o
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:19:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#634276: fixed in mgp 1.13a+upstream20090219-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #634276,
regarding mgp: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.dsc
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3.debian.tar.gz
mgp_1.13a+upstream20090219-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ka
Accepted:
wdm_1.28-7.debian.tar.gz
to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-7.debian.tar.gz
wdm_1.28-7.dsc
to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-7.dsc
wdm_1.28-7_amd64.deb
to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-7_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
wdm_1.28-7.dsc - source x11
wdm_1.28-7_amd64.deb - optional x11
Announcing to
wdm_1.28-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
wdm_1.28-7.dsc
wdm_1.28-7.debian.tar.gz
wdm_1.28-7_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debi
wdm_1.28-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
wdm_1.28-7.dsc
wdm_1.28-7.debian.tar.gz
wdm_1.28-7_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ..
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#634642: fixed in wdm 1.28-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #634642,
regarding wdm: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: wdm
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: linux-any
The debian/control file in wdm uses a negated list of architectures
to specify a package relationship (most likely Build-Depends) on a
Linux-specific package. I.e. something like:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [
Package: qpxtool
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd-any
The debian/control file in qpxtool uses a hardcoded list of kfreebsd-*
architectures (e.g "kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64") to specify a package
relationship (most likely Build-Depends) that isn't specific
Package: sweep
Version: 0.9.3-4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Add patch from Philippe Gauthier that removes crufty code,
thereby resolving vis
Source: wdm
Version: 1.28-6
Severity: important
Hello Debian QA Group,
We are transitionning from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8.
As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update wdm to
Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.
The following Build-Depends was found:
wdm :Build-D
13 matches
Mail list logo
