Hi,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:34:08PM +, Markus Koschany wrote:
>* Build-Depend on libtiff5-dev. Thanks to Michael Terry for the patch.
> (Closes: #681079)
You shouldn't apply something like that without verifying stuff.. People
file such stuff even when the stuff isn't yet ready..
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Please revert and wait for a *coodinated* transition here.
Ah, well, it's maintained by QA anyway...
Done myself.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 681079 1.0.23-3
Bug #681079 {Done: Markus Koschany } [sane-backends]
sane-backends: Build-Depend on libtiff5-dev
There is no source info for the package 'sane-backends' at version '1.0.23-3'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source ver
sane-backends_1.0.23-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sane-backends_1.0.23-3.dsc
sane-backends_1.0.23-3.debian.tar.gz
sane-utils_1.0.23-3_amd64.deb
libsane-common_1.0.23-3_amd64.deb
libsane_1.0.23-3_amd64.deb
libsane-dev_1.0.23-3_amd64.deb
libsa
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:20:16 +0200
Source: sane-backends
Binary: sane-utils libsane-common libsane libsane-dev libsane-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.23-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Q
neko_2.0.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
neko_2.0.0-2.dsc
neko_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
neko_2.0.0-2.debian.tar.gz
libapache2-mod-neko_2.0.0-2_all.deb
neko-dev_2.0.0-2_all.deb
libneko0_2.0.0-2_amd64.deb
neko_2.0.0-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Yo
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:32:32 +0200
Source: neko
Binary: libneko0 neko-dev neko libapache2-mod-neko
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By:
Package: sane-backends
Version: 1.0.23-1
Severity: serious
[ X-Debbugs-Cc to Markus, who introduced this. ]
Hi,
sane-backends (1.0.23-1) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* Build-Depend on libusb-1.0-0-dev and enable libusb1.0 support in
debian/rules. Thanks to Martin Pitt for the report and Wh
Hi,
The "fix" in 1.0.23-1 need to be reverted, which I just did. Reasoning:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/07/msg00126.html
- Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard -
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:33:53 +
From: Rene Engelhard
To: debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Subjec
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 353980 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #353980 [fortune-mod] fortune-mod: Fortune invocation by relative path
broken in two different ways.
Removed tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> tags 353980 confirmed
Bug #353980 [fortune-mod] fortune-m
tags 353980 - moreinfo unreproducible
tags 353980 confirmed
thanks
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:57:17AM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> I can still reproduce this issue as at fortune-mod 1:1.99.1-6, but
> only for the trailing slash case.
Yeah, I see. fortune-mod has several issues with paths, actual
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 223988 wontfix
Bug #223988 [fortune-mod] ~/.fortunes
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> Thank you for reporting this bug.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> I agree with you that adding custom fortunes in a simple way would be a nice
U
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 157191 wontfix
Bug #157191 [fortune-mod] fortune-mod: an option to use fortunes from all
locales
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
157191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
tags 223988 wontfix
Thank you for reporting this bug.
I agree with you that adding custom fortunes in a simple way would be a nice
addition to fortune-mod. OTOH, this should be done by upstream developers, who
seems vanished, unfortunately. Further, the whole way fortne-mod accesses the
db and ex
tags 157191 wontfix
stop
Thank you for your reporting this bug.
Actually, I'm not sure this feature would be that useful. Anyway, I suppose
this is the kind of feature that should be added by upstream. Unfortunately,
upstream developers abandoned the development of fortune-mod, and I'm not sure
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 415831 pending
Bug #415831 [fortune-mod] fortune-mod: Man page gives incorrect information
about usage offensive fortunes
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
415831: http://
Hello Rene,
i assumed that the fix for
http://bugs.debian.org/714441
will solve the issue automatically. On KFreeBSD libusb1-0-0-dev is
provided by libusb2-dev.
The issue is that libgphoto2-2 build-depends on an outdated and
unsupported libusb 0.1 library which is provided by libusb-dev on KFre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 715064 normal
Bug #715064 [firebird-dev] Broken library symlink detected in firebird-dev
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> severity 715066 normal
Bug #715066 [libindicate-gtk3-dev] Broken library symlink detected in
libindicate-g
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#520428: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #520428,
regarding units: Does not have the twip unit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661903: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #661903,
regarding units --help should mention how to see the list of all the units
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606403: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606403,
regarding units - Manpage typos, etc.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#704506: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #704506,
regarding units -h should say how to print out a list of all the units the
program knows
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#702543: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #702543,
regarding units 2.0 was released in 2012
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#591526: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #591526,
regarding Elementary charge (e) does not match latest CODATA
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604615: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604615,
regarding add Taiwanese units
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695909: fixed in units 2.01-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695909,
regarding units: Please use /usr/bin/pager as default pager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
26 matches
Mail list logo
