Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 788970 pending
Bug #788970 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:abiword] abiword:
please adapt for libwps 0.4
Added tag(s) pending.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
788970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
binary:gir1.2-abiword-3.0 is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely processed through to t
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:11:12 +0200
Source: abiword
Binary: abiword-common abiword abiword-plugin-grammar abiword-plugin-mathview
libabiword-3.0 libabiword-3.0-dev abiword-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.0.0-9
abiword_3.0.0-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
abiword_3.0.0-9.dsc
abiword_3.0.0-9.debian.tar.xz
abiword-common_3.0.0-9_all.deb
abiword-dbg_3.0.0-9_amd64.deb
abiword-plugin-grammar_3.0.0-9_amd64.deb
abiword-plugin-mathview_3.0.0-9_amd64.deb
abiw
abiword_3.0.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
abiword_3.0.1-3.dsc
abiword_3.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz
abiword-common_3.0.1-3_all.deb
abiword-dbg_3.0.1-3_amd64.deb
abiword-plugin-grammar_3.0.1-3_amd64.deb
abiword-plugin-mathview_3.0.1-3_amd64.deb
abiw
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jun 2015 06:19:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#788970: fixed in abiword 3.0.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #788970,
regarding abiword: please adapt for libwps 0.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 15:16:28)
> You are still trying to boil this down to the mere problem with cmus,
This bugreport is filed against cmus, is it not?
> but that's just a side effect. The real point is that roaraudio
> depends on an unmaintained piece of core software
Quoting Don Armstrong (2015-06-20 14:38:25)
> There's clearly a bug here, but even after reading this bug log, I've
> had to do research on my own to determine what that issue is.
>
> If the libroar2 maintainers which to keep decnet support, then someone
> should probably figure out how to circu
Hi Adrian,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:16:28PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 09:52 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> > Please do for the reasons mentioned below. Also these are
> > considered standard of a good bug report.
>
> No, the problem is apparent and I don't really w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 09:52 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> Please do for the reasons mentioned below. Also these are
> considered standard of a good bug report.
No, the problem is apparent and I don't really want to debug libdnet.
You are still trying to b
Hi Adrian,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 07:34:25PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 01:03 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> > Thanks for pointing that out. I was mistaken there. Sorry :(
>
> No worries, I don't think we disagree about the problem in general.
>
> > Can you maybe st
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 20.06.2015 um 19:51 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> ld the release back because of such ancient
> >>> software?
> >
> >> OK, so lets drop iceweasel? This is definitly offtopic here
> >
> > No, we dropped sparc as a release architecture as a re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 08:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> glaubitz@ikarus:~$ apt-cache depends cmus | grep libroar2
>> Recommends: libroar2 glaubitz@ikarus:~$
>
> I agree that cmus pulls in libroar2. Why is that dangerous?
Because libroar _depends_ on l
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 13:00:53)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/20/2015 07:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> I can't imagine that you cannot reproduce this on a clean
>>> install, I could reproduce it on all machines running at least
>>> Jessi
Am 20.06.2015 um 19:51 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
ld the release back because of such ancient
>>> software?
>
>> OK, so lets drop iceweasel? This is definitly offtopic here
>
> No, we dropped sparc as a release architecture as a result
> in case you missed that.
Because of roaraudio? Oh
Am 20.06.2015 um 19:28 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 06/20/2015 06:56 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> I can't say what's right or best for cmus, but what is right for
>>> Debian seems fairly self evident to everyone but the roar
>>> maintainers.
>
>> There is no depenedencie of *roar* to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 07:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I can't imagine that you cannot reproduce this on a clean
>> install, I could reproduce it on all machines running at least
>> Jessie.
>
> Please provide the command to reproduce _without_ --with-su
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 12:34:25)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/20/2015 01:03 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> > Thanks for pointing that out. I was mistaken there. Sorry :(
>
> No worries, I don't think we disagree about the problem in general.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 01:12 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> It's definitely the Debian way when a certain package
>> functionality that maybe a handful people need breaks other
>> packages. Then it's your duty as a good Debian maintainer to get
>> rid of the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 01:06 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> Could you please make a bug against roaraudio asking to drop the
> libdnet dependency?
There are already three of such bug reports:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755934
> htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 01:03 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that out. I was mistaken there. Sorry :(
No worries, I don't think we disagree about the problem in general.
> Can you maybe still provide a backtrace/strace log?
This isn't re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 06:56 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> I can't say what's right or best for cmus, but what is right for
>> Debian seems fairly self evident to everyone but the roar
>> maintainers.
>
> There is no depenedencie of *roar* to dnet at all.
Am 20.06.2015 um 18:45 schrieb Ron:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:02:50PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at
>>> all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this..
>>
>> It's
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:02:50PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at
> > all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this..
>
> It's Adrian, not John, and I am just quoting
package: pidgin-openpgp
version: 0.1-2
severity: grave
I can only receive openpgp messages, sending does not work.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 20.06.2015 um 13:02 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at
>> all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this..
>
> It's Adrian, not John, and I am just quoting Ron who certainly
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:42:57PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Could you please make a bug against roaraudio asking to drop the libdnet
dependency?
> Stephan,
>
> seriously, you are missing the point. Absolutely _no_one_ needs ROAR
> audio with DECnet support except you an
Hi Adrian,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:47:57PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 12:23 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> > Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try
> > to remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically.
>
> Btw, how did you remov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at
> all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this..
It's Adrian, not John, and I am just quoting Ron who certainly isn't
making this
Am 20.06.2015 um 12:42 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> Stephan,
>
> seriously, you are missing the point. Absolutely _no_one_ needs ROAR
> audio with DECnet support except you and your buddy Patrick.
I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at all :o
John: please stop wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 12:23 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try
> to remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically.
Btw, how did you remove libslp1 without removing libroar2?
glaubitz@i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2015 12:23 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote:
> Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try
> to remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically.
Oh, and btw, removing essential packages like OpenSLP is _not_ an
opti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Stephan,
seriously, you are missing the point. Absolutely _no_one_ needs ROAR
audio with DECnet support except you and your buddy Patrick.
If you desperately need ROAR audio in cmus, then you can rebuild it
manually. Debian should not keep packages
Hi,
I will post the important part of one of my previous mails again:
Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try to
remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically.
I can't reproduce the bug on a fresh debian wheezy VM. And neither on
a fresh debian jessie VM.
Ple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/19/2015 01:37 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> From the bug:
>> RC severity mostly so this shows up on the radars of all the
>> right people crossing off the details we need to finalise for the
>> release.
>
> That doesn't apply here.
stretch will
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:19:57 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I see this bug tagged as pending. ... please explain the fix.
Looks like you missed the explanation provided in the tag pending:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=9;bug=717536
# Source package in NEW: http://packages.
36 matches
Mail list logo
