glfer is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-06-21 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
glfer 0.4.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-21 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 786694: fftw: FTBFS with TZ=GMT-14 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

dhcpcd5 is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-06-21 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
dhcpcd5 6.0.5-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-28 It is affected by these RC bugs: 788693: dhcpcd5: FTBFS: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct in6_pktinfo' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

ifrit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-06-21 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
ifrit 3.4.2-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-13 It is affected by these RC bugs: 788766: ifrit: FTBFS with libvtk5.8: VTK is not found. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d

gramofile is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-06-21 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
gramofile 1.6-9 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-21 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 786694: fftw: FTBFS with TZ=GMT-14 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d

xombrero_1.6.4-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-06-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:49:07 -0300 Source: xombrero Binary: xombrero xxxterm Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2:1.6.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mot

Processing of xombrero_1.6.4-3_amd64.changes

2015-06-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
xombrero_1.6.4-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xombrero_1.6.4-3.dsc xombrero_1.6.4-3.debian.tar.xz xombrero_1.6.4-3_amd64.deb xxxterm_1.6.4-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-21 Thread Stephan Jauernick
Hi Adrian, On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:29:21AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/21/2015 02:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Even just checking for the existence of dnet-common or similar > >> would probably be enough. > > > > As I understand it, these are the issues raised here:

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-21 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/21/2015 02:36 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 15:16:28) >> You are still trying to boil this down to the mere problem with >> cmus, > > This bugreport is filed against cmus, is it not? This is corre

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-21 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/21/2015 02:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Even just checking for the existence of dnet-common or similar >> would probably be enough. > > As I understand it, these are the issues raised here: You understand incorrectly then. > a) libdnet

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-21 Thread Ron
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 07:31:50PM -0500, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Don Armstrong (2015-06-20 14:38:25) > > There's clearly a bug here, but even after reading this bug log, I've > > had to do research on my own to determine what that issue is. > > > > If the libroar2 maintainers which to