psutils_1.17.dfsg-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-08-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:59:27 -0400 Source: psutils Binary: psutils Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.17.dfsg-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Jay

Processing of psutils_1.17.dfsg-3_amd64.changes

2016-08-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
psutils_1.17.dfsg-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: psutils_1.17.dfsg-3.dsc psutils_1.17.dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz psutils-dbgsym_1.17.dfsg-3_amd64.deb psutils_1.17.dfsg-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#731709: grub-efi UEFI support based on debian-cd work complete (repos)

2016-08-26 Thread adrian15
El 26/08/16 a las 09:52, Raphael Hertzog escribió: (...) Can you explain to me why such Installation entries are not available in binary_syslinux? Maybe they should be put there also? Well, the menu entries are there by default: $ cat share/bootloaders/isolinux/menu.cfg menu hshift 0 menu

Bug#731709: grub-efi UEFI support based on debian-cd work complete (repos)

2016-08-26 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 26 August 2016 at 13:34, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote: >> > Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of >> > isolinux/syslinux in live-build. >> I know, but the purpose of my patch is to add UEFI support. Not to improve >>

Bug#731709: grub-efi UEFI support based on debian-cd work complete (repos)

2016-08-26 Thread adrian15
El 26/08/16 a las 13:34, Raphael Hertzog escribió: On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote: Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of isolinux/syslinux in live-build. I know, but the purpose of my patch is to add UEFI support. Not to improve visual appearance of grub2 so that it

Bug#731709: grub-efi UEFI support based on debian-cd work complete (repos)

2016-08-26 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I believe that syslinux-efi works for less cases than grub-efi Discussions on syslinux mailing lists indicate that syslinux-efi does not work with optical drives. (And i know of no bootable ISO 9660 image which would have syslinux-efi in its El Torito boot image

Bug#731709: grub-efi UEFI support based on debian-cd work complete (repos)

2016-08-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote: > > Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of > > isolinux/syslinux in live-build. > I know, but the purpose of my patch is to add UEFI support. Not to improve > visual appearance of grub2 so that it matches the isolinux/syslinux one. Well,

Bug#731709: grub-efi UEFI support based on debian-cd work complete (repos)

2016-08-26 Thread adrian15
El 26/08/16 a las 09:52, Raphael Hertzog escribió: On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote: That's how the grub-pc menu (BIOS) shows currently in live-build. Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of isolinux/syslinux in live-build. I know, but the purpose of my patch is to

Bug#731709: grub-efi UEFI support based on debian-cd work complete (repos)

2016-08-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote: > That's how the grub-pc menu (BIOS) shows currently in live-build. Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of isolinux/syslinux in live-build. > > - there are no menu entries to start debian-installer even though > >I built my image with