autopsy is marked for autoremoval from testing

autopsy 2.24-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-04-14 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 923959: afflib: FTBFS (dh_makeshlibs fails)

Processed: found 924613 in 20140202+stable-3.1, fixed 924613 in 20180621~6979c25-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 924613 20140202+stable-3.1 Bug #924613 [src:gnulib] CVE-2009-5155 Marked as found in versions gnulib/20140202+stable-3.1. > fixed 924613 20180621~6979c25-1 Bug #924613 [src:gnulib] CVE-2009-5155 Marked as fixed in versions

Processed: Re: autofs: new upstream version (5.1.5) available

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #912947 [src:autofs] autofs: new upstream version (5.1.5) available Marked Bug as done > fixed -1 5.1.5-1 Bug #912947 {Done: Mike Gabriel } [src:autofs] autofs: new upstream version (5.1.5) available Marked as fixed in versions autofs/5.1.5-1. --

Bug#917228: autofs: Orphaning package?

Control: close -1 Hi, On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 14:22:52 +0100 =?utf-8?Q?Manu_Al=C3=A9n?= wrote: > Source: autofs > Hi, > > I have worked with autofs and although I’m going to take care of some packages more, I think that I could have a bit time to support it. > > Please do not hesitate to give

Bug#912947: autofs: new upstream version (5.1.5) available

Control: close -1 Control: fixed -1 5.1.5-1 Hi Salvatore, On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:25:22 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: autofs > Severity: wishlist > > Hi > > There was a new autofs version released (5.1.5) upstream, could it be > packaged for Debian? > > Regards, > Salvatore > >

Processed: Re: autofs: Orphaning package?

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #917228 [src:autofs] autofs: Orphaning package? Marked Bug as done -- 917228: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917228 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#924613: CVE-2009-5155

Source: gnulib Severity: grave Tags: security Please see https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-5155 Patch: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=5513b40999149090987a0341c018d05d3eea1272 Cheers, Moritz

Bug#892374: marked as done (autofs: can't specify nfsvers=4.1 in auto.master)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#892374: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #892374, regarding autofs: can't specify nfsvers=4.1 in auto.master to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#737679: marked as done (autofs does not appear to support IPv6 hostname lookups for NFS mounts)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#737679: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #737679, regarding autofs does not appear to support IPv6 hostname lookups for NFS mounts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#902565: marked as done (autofs not migrated to salsa.d.o(?))

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#902565: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #902565, regarding autofs not migrated to salsa.d.o(?) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#910367: marked as done (autofs: No way to mount smb share with a dollar sign at the end)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#910367: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #910367, regarding autofs: No way to mount smb share with a dollar sign at the end to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#864857: marked as done ([patch] avoid blhc warning about -fPIE)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#864857: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #864857, regarding [patch] avoid blhc warning about -fPIE to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#784301: marked as done (autofs: BROWSE_MODE in /etc/default/autofs no longer honored. nobrowse in auto.master is.)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#784301: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #784301, regarding autofs: BROWSE_MODE in /etc/default/autofs no longer honored. nobrowse in auto.master is. to be marked as done. This means

Bug#842199: marked as done (autofs should pull in network-online.target and nfs-client.target and related issues)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#842199: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #842199, regarding autofs should pull in network-online.target and nfs-client.target and related issues to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#901554: marked as done (autofs: please add DEP8 tests)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#901554: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #901554, regarding autofs: please add DEP8 tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#805028: marked as done (autofs-ldap fails to start when /etc/autofs_ldap_auth.conf has wrong permissions)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#805028: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #805028, regarding autofs-ldap fails to start when /etc/autofs_ldap_auth.conf has wrong permissions to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#787202: marked as done (Regression: autofs 5.1.1 can't access "hidden" samba shares, 5.0.8 can.)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#787202: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #787202, regarding Regression: autofs 5.1.1 can't access "hidden" samba shares, 5.0.8 can. to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#757038: marked as done (autofs: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#757038: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #757038, regarding autofs: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#709366: marked as done (autofs: automount doesn't work with numerical IPv6 address)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#709366: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #709366, regarding autofs: automount doesn't work with numerical IPv6 address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#709366: autofs: automount doesn't work with numerical IPv6 address

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Philippe, On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:22:06 +0200 Philippe Latu wrote: > Package: autofs > Version: 5.0.7-3 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** > > * What led up to the situation? > While

Processed: Re: autofs: automount doesn't work with numerical IPv6 address

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #709366 [autofs] autofs: automount doesn't work with numerical IPv6 address Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 709366: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Does this autofs bug also happen with a i386 kernel

Processing control commands: > tags -1 wontfix Bug #708256 [autofs] wheezy autofs /usr/sbin/automount crashes Added tag(s) wontfix. > close -1 Bug #708256 [autofs] wheezy autofs /usr/sbin/automount crashes Marked Bug as done -- 708256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708256

Bug#708256: Does this autofs bug also happen with a i386 kernel

Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: close -1 Hi, On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:16:54 -0400 "John E. Davis" wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:55:38 +0200, Reinhard Tartler said: > >from your logs, I notice that you are running an i386 userland with > >amd64 kernel. Can you confirm the segfaults also

Bug#861992: autofs: Fail while installing (arm64)

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On Sun, 07 May 2017 10:22:06 +0500 Anton Karmanov wrote: > Package: autofs > Version: 5.0.8-2+deb8u1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > I'am trying to get autofs package whith apt on an arm64 machine. > During installation I get the messages: > >

Bug#910367: autofs: No way to mount smb share with a dollar sign at the end

Hi, On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:18:08 +0200 Vincent Danjean wrote: > Package: autofs > Version: 5.1.2-1 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > Since stretch update, there is no way to automount a smb share with a '$' at > the end of its name anymore. But these names are automaticcaly generated by >

Processed: Re: autofs: Fail while installing (arm64)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #861992 [autofs] autofs: Fail while installing (arm64) Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 861992: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861992 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#897897: Kernel security fix (for CVE-2018-1108) -> AutoFS won't start

Control: close -1 Hi Cedric, On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:07:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Dufour_-_Idiap_Research_Institute?= wrote: > It seems this problem is adressed more globally as per bug #897599: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897599 > > Which led to fix for

Processed: Re: Kernel security fix (for CVE-2018-1108) -> AutoFS won't start

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #897897 [autofs] Kernel security fix (for CVE-2018-1108) -> AutoFS won't start Marked Bug as done -- 897897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897897 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#832628: autofs: Autofs does not unmount mounted filesystems after HUP

Control: fixed -1 5.1.0-1 Control: tags -1 jessie HI, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:05:17 -0400 Colten Levi wrote: > Package: autofs > Version: 5.0.8-2+deb8u1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > I was able to patch

Processed: Re: autofs: Autofs does not unmount mounted filesystems after HUP

Processing control commands: > fixed -1 5.1.0-1 Bug #832628 [autofs] autofs: Autofs does not unmount mounted filesystems after HUP Marked as fixed in versions autofs/5.1.0-1. > tags -1 jessie Bug #832628 [autofs] autofs: Autofs does not unmount mounted filesystems after HUP Added tag(s) jessie.

Bug#842199: autofs should pull in network-online.target and nfs-client.target and related issues

Hi Daniel, I am currently adopting the orphaned autofs package. The issue you reported here as something that we have been observing in Debian Edu deployments for years. Thanks for proposing a fix. On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:28:01 -0700 Daniel Lakeland wrote: > > Package: autofs > Version:

La Croisière des Stars est de retour en Méditerranée avec MaCroisiere.ma

Afin de voir votre message, cliquez sur le lien: http://link.wibzen.com/v/443/dc70f9a80a9d1305eca0c6310593eb2141cdf7cc9df7c71f

New wig: Preplucked 13x6inch lace front wig transparent lace wig A new wig: Preplucked 13*6 inch lace front wig.

96 LOOSE CULRY ,BODY WAVE ,STRAIGHT ,CURLY ,LOOSE WAVE WHICH YOUR END CLIENTS WANT MOSTLY Available ON Stock Color wig ,cusomized wig only need 3 wokirng days Wana know which the end clients like or any further questions just feel free to contact me . m: +8615018763458 w: [1]