Re: guesoglc FTBFS: make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../src/glew.c', needed by 'libGLC_la-glew.lo'. Stop.

Control: tags -1 + sid On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:14:21 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > quesoglc fails to build from source in unstable. This seems to have been caused by the update to autoconf, it does not occur with bookworm and upgrading autoconf to sid causes the issue. Looking at the config.log, t

Processed: gyrus: depends on amtk which has been abandoned upstream

Processing control commands: > block 993922 by -1 Bug #993922 [src:amtk] amtk: abandoned upstream 993922 was blocked by: 993909 993929 993928 993922 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 993922: 993931 -- 993922: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993922 993931: http

Bug#993931: gyrus: depends on amtk which has been abandoned upstream

Source: gyrus Version: 0.3.12-1 Severity: important User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs Control: block 993922 by -1 X-Debbugs-Cc: Yavor Doganov , Jonathan Carter amtk has been frozen and archived upstream, and contributions are no longer accepted. See https://git

Bug#993932: gyrus: unmaintained upstream

Package: gyrus Version: 0.3.12-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream wontfix X-Debbugs-Cc: Yavor Doganov , Jonathan Carter gyrus is unmaintained upstream, and has been archived and made read-only: . Its most recent release was in 2013. The version in Debian

Bug#981496: svtools: ship with bullseye?

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:35:45PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Package: svtools > Version: 0.6-4 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > the package "svtools" has been orphaned by its original maintainer > over 7 years ago. The Debian maintainer was also the upstream > maintainer. Upstream has a

Processed: tagging 978840

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 978840 + ftbfs Bug #978840 [src:java2html] java2html: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 978840: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978

Bug#993957: (no subject)

Package: schroot Version: 1.6.10-12 Severity: important schroot 1.6.10 (04 May 2014) fails with a continuous attempt to read a non-existent subdirectory, /run/systemd/userdb, when operating a type "directory" schroot. a type "plain" does not have this same issue. creating the missing subdirector

Bug#993957:

On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 16:58 +0100, lkcl wrote: > schroot 1.6.10 (04 May 2014) fails with a continuous attempt to read > a non-existent subdirectory, /run/systemd/userdb, when operating a > type "directory" schroot. > So far as I can see from the strace output you provided, that doesn't actually a

Bug#993957:

On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 18:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 16:58 +0100, lkcl wrote: > > schroot 1.6.10 (04 May 2014) fails with a continuous attempt to > > read > > a non-existent subdirectory, /run/systemd/userdb, when operating a > > type "directory" schroot. > > > > So f

Bug#993957:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2021 18:27:39 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 18:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 16:58 +0100, lkcl wrote: > > > schroot 1.6.10 (04 May 2014) fails with a continuous attempt to > > > read > > > a non-existent subdirectory, /run/sys

Bug#826911: marked as done (pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Missing man page for update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:37:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979047: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #826911, regarding pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Missing man page for update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#978954: marked as done (pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:37:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979047: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #978954, regarding pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#979047: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pepperflashplugin-nonfree | 1.8.8 | source, amd64, i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; No longer work; upstream eol -

Bug#979047: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 1.8.8+rm Dear submitter, as the package pepperflashplugin-nonfree has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.

user autoc...@packages.debian.org, usertagging 993870

user autoc...@packages.debian.org usertags 993870 + autoconf-2.71 thanks

user autoc...@packages.debian.org, usertagging 993870

user autoc...@packages.debian.org usertags 993870 - autoconf-2.71 thanks