Bug#996285: freelan: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2021-10-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: freelan Version: 2.2-3 Severity: important Tags: bookworm sid User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-3.0 Hi, Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the following error:

tcm_2.20+TSQD-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2021-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:38:16 +0200 Source: tcm Architecture: source Version: 2.20+TSQD-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann Closes: 849618 866158 981310

pngtools_0.4-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2021-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:41:33 -0400 Source: pngtools Architecture: source Version: 0.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan Yang Changes: pngtools (0.4-2) unstable;

Bug#984361: marked as done (tcm: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:27:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984361: fixed in tcm 2.20+TSQD-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #984361, regarding tcm: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#981310: marked as done (tcm FTCBFS: uses the build architecture compiler)

2021-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:27:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981310: fixed in tcm 2.20+TSQD-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #981310, regarding tcm FTCBFS: uses the build architecture compiler to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#866158: marked as done (tcm: transfig package renamed to fig2dev)

2021-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:27:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#866158: fixed in tcm 2.20+TSQD-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #866158, regarding tcm: transfig package renamed to fig2dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#849618: marked as done (tcm: please add dependency “Suggests: tcm-doc”)

2021-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:27:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#849618: fixed in tcm 2.20+TSQD-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #849618, regarding tcm: please add dependency “Suggests: tcm-doc” to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processing of pngtools_0.4-2_source.changes

2021-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
pngtools_0.4-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pngtools_0.4-2.dsc pngtools_0.4.orig.tar.gz pngtools_0.4-2.debian.tar.xz pngtools_0.4-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processing of tcm_2.20+TSQD-7_source.changes

2021-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
tcm_2.20+TSQD-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tcm_2.20+TSQD-7.dsc tcm_2.20+TSQD-7.debian.tar.xz tcm_2.20+TSQD-7_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processed: Re: tcm: FTBFS on non-linux archs

2021-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 help Bug #696824 [tcm] tcm: FTBFS on non-linux archs Added tag(s) help. -- 696824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696824 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#696824: tcm: FTBFS on non-linux archs

2021-10-12 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 help On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:51:48 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote: Package: tcm Version: 2.20+TSQD-4.2 tcm currently FTBFS on non-linux archs, apparently due to a non-matching patch, see for instance Actually, the problem starts with the build system not recognizing the

Bug#996259: Report bug ifenslave

2021-10-12 Thread Luka
Package: ifenslave Version: 2.12 When I try to configure the bonging without VLANs in /etc/network/interfaces, it is working after reboot. (example below) auto bond0 iface bond0 inet manual bond-slaves eno1 eno2 In my setup, I have two physical interfaces and two VLANs. My configuration in

Last online activation period (Secure Go Plus) October 12, 2021 -Nr8471477538

2021-10-12 Thread Vr.de -VoIksbank

Last online activation period (Secure Go Plus) October 12, 2021 -Nr1878563363

2021-10-12 Thread Vr.de -VoIksbank

Last online activation period (Secure Go Plus) October 12, 2021 -Nr8752334509

2021-10-12 Thread Vr.de -VoIksbank

Last online activation period (Secure Go Plus) October 12, 2021 -Nr3644470531

2021-10-12 Thread Vr.de -VoIksbank

Aktivieren Sie nun (Vr-SecureGo Plus) -Nr2411028037

2021-10-12 Thread Vr.de Volksbank