Hi Eriberto,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:55:05AM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> The current packaging license (GPL-2+) is incompatible with upstream
> licensing (DocBook License). It is a hampering condition to submit patches
> from Debian to the upstream.
>
> I would like to change the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1006038 + fixed-upstream patch
Bug #1006038 [src:git-remote-hg] git-remote-hg: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
make -j8 test returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch.
> forwarded 1006038
> https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-h
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:39:00 -0300
Source: docbook
Architecture: source
Version: 4.5-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Changes:
docbook (4.5-9) un
docbook_4.5-9_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
docbook_4.5-9.dsc
docbook_4.5-9.debian.tar.xz
docbook_4.5-9_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Package: docbook
Version: 4.5-9
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin , Adam Di Carlo
, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) , Yann Dirson
, Steve Langasek , Daniel Leidert (dale)
, Jakub Wilk , Mathieu Malaterre
, Helmut Grohne
The current packaging license (GPL-2+) is incompatible with upstream
lice
Ready to make insane cash by just downloading mobile apps. Sounds ridiculous,
huh? But, it's not. It only takes 3 minutes to download an app and get paid.
=> Witness the unbelievable Here >>>
https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=MJ32N&m=gvAM0RTHQEOqP2.&b=aNHTRA9dcCUoCciWOj6H5Q
Say no to techni
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 23:45:03 +0100
Source: gnubiff
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.17-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Adam Borowski
Closes: 984159
Changes:
gnubiff (2.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:09:27 +0100
Source: codelite
Architecture: source
Version: 14.0+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Håvard F. Aasen
Closes: 997219 1000928
Changes
codelite_14.0+dfsg-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
codelite_14.0+dfsg-2.dsc
codelite_14.0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
codelite_14.0+dfsg-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
gnubiff_2.2.17-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnubiff_2.2.17-4.dsc
gnubiff_2.2.17-4.debian.tar.xz
gnubiff_2.2.17-4_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 23:03:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997219: fixed in codelite 14.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #997219,
regarding codelite: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-12 or 13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 23:03:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997219: fixed in codelite 14.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #997219,
regarding codelite: FTBFS: IHunSpell.cpp:67:17: error: use of deleted function
‘std::unordered_set<_Value, _Hash, _Pred, _Alloc>:
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 23:03:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#984159: fixed in gnubiff 2.2.17-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #984159,
regarding gnubiff: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 23:03:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000928: fixed in codelite 14.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000928,
regarding codelite: FTBFS: IHunSpell.cpp:67:17: error: use of deleted function
‘std::unordered_set<_Value, _Hash, _Pred, _Alloc
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 23:03:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000928: fixed in codelite 14.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000928,
regarding codelite: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-12 or 13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: fslint
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: waxh...@dirtcellar.net
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
fslint was removed from the Debian repos
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Cried, that was ineffective - so I visited fsli
Did you ever earn a dime for just downloading a mobile app? Obviously not, that
would be ridiculous…wouldn’t it? No. That’s because no one told you about the
profits which tech giants are making with your app downloads. Turn the profits
on your behalf with DownloadDollars and get paid over n' ov
17 matches
Mail list logo
