On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 09:08:38PM +, stefa...@debian.org wrote:
> It only processes packages that look like they are named like a python
> module, or depend on ${python3:Depends}.
In this case, the gensio-bin package contains some tools, one of which
is written in python (and seldomly used).
Hello,
I have been trying to reach you.
Get back to me.
Regards,
Jon
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:29:08 -0300
Source: xfonts-cronyx
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.8+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Closes: 1016557
xfonts-cronyx_2.3.8+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfonts-cronyx_2.3.8+dfsg-1.dsc
xfonts-cronyx_2.3.8+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
xfonts-cronyx_2.3.8+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
xfonts-cronyx_2.3.8+dfsg-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:25:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016557: fixed in xfonts-cronyx 2.3.8+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016557,
regarding xfonts-cronyx: Non-DFSG file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Control: tag -1 - unreproducible
Hi Marc (2022.08.15_19:29:46_+)
> Now I know. The package in question is not python3-gensio, it's
> gensio-bin.
Aha, you are hitting this bit of logic:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/dh-python/-/blob/0895a390c27c8d7a4b1150aeca79505a9784a3f5/dhpyth
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - unreproducible
Bug #101700 [nvi] U undo fails on multiple Joined lines
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #101700 to the same tags previously set
--
101700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=101700
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Version: 2.0.42+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package dpatch has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1010626
The ve
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
dpatch | 2.0.42 | source, all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; obsolete
--
Note that the package(s) have simply bee
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:09:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010626: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #400092,
regarding /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/dpatch/01_config.dpatch uses
undocumented interface
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:09:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010626: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #400092,
regarding dpatch: [dpatch.lib.sh] DPATCH_LIB_NO_DEFAULT is not documented in
dpatch(1) manual
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:09:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010626: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #397290,
regarding dpatch: prerequisites for dpep?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:09:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010626: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #328397,
regarding dpatch-convert-diffgz should work without dpkg-buildpackage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:09:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010626: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005988,
regarding Don't release with bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:52:14 +0530
with message-id <20220815072214.zvbibupkz6hqktsm@debian>
and subject line Re: Bug#271959: glame: Segfaults on exit
has caused the Debian Bug report #271959,
regarding glame: Segfaults on exit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:01:49 +0530
Source: ygl
Architecture: source
Version: 4.2e-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Nilesh Patra
Closes: 1007483 1014560
Changes:
ygl (4.2e
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:04:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014560: fixed in ygl 4.2e-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014560,
regarding ygl: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in libYgl.so.*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:04:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1007483: fixed in ygl 4.2e-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007483,
regarding ygl: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
ygl_4.2e-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ygl_4.2e-6.dsc
ygl_4.2e-6.debian.tar.xz
ygl_4.2e-6_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
19 matches
Mail list logo
