Bug#1011500: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries

tags 1011500 + pending patch thanks I've just uploaded an updated version of tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-5.1 to DELAYED/3. This variant of the upload actually includes the fix for #941296 which was missed when preparing the upload. tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium .

Processed: Re: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1011500 + pending patch Bug #1011500 [src:tuxcmd-modules] tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1011500 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processi

Processing of tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.changes

tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.dsc tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.debian.tar.xz tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_a

Processed: Re: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1011500 + pending patch Bug #1011500 [src:tuxcmd-modules] tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries Added tag(s) pending. > tags 941296 + pending patch Bug #941296 [src:tuxcmd-modules] tuxcmd-modules FTCBF

Bug#1011500: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries

tags 1011500 + pending patch tags 941296 + pending patch thanks I've just uploaded tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-5.1 to DELAYED/10: tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Apply a patch by Vagrant Cascadian to ensure that tuxcmd-modules does n

python-pam_0.4.2-16_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:02:44 +0100 Source: python-pam Architecture: source Version: 0.4.2-16 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca Closes: 487510 1023902 Changes:

Processing of python-pam_0.4.2-16_amd64.changes

python-pam_0.4.2-16_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-pam_0.4.2-16.dsc python-pam_0.4.2-16.debian.tar.xz python-pam_0.4.2-16_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#487510: marked as done (python-pam: Example code is incorrect)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:49:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#487510: fixed in python-pam 0.4.2-16 has caused the Debian Bug report #487510, regarding python-pam: Example code is incorrect to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#1023902: marked as done (python-pam FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported version)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:49:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023902: fixed in python-pam 0.4.2-16 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023902, regarding python-pam FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1024301: redland-bindings: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

Source: redland-bindings Version: 1.0.17.1+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.11 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This

Re: Identify original submitter of tac_plus package

Hi Neil, thanks for all the information you gave. Now having all the information history and considerations, i think that effectively the best approach seems to be pushing our code in a github repository and see if people are interested in it. Thanks for your reply. Le mer. 9 nov. 2022 à 09:32,