Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 1024180 3.0.2-2
Bug #1024180 {Done: David da Silva Polverari }
[src:pngcheck] pngcheck: autopkgtest needs update for new version of zlib:
warning on stderr
No longer marked as fixed in versions pngcheck/3.0.2-2.
> fixed 997664 6.4.1+dfs
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #300833,
regarding no logrotate configuration (should it be a bind9 bugreport?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #267292,
regarding Wrong permissions on /var/lib/bindgraph/bindgraph.rrd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #301823,
regarding bindgraph: PID is stored in an strange directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #359261,
regarding bindgraph: Graph top x Clients too
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #806946,
regarding bindgraph doesn't show any graphic
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #931756,
regarding bindgraph stop action fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #476834,
regarding gnuift: Program committed suicide
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #482781,
regarding /usr/bin/gift-mrml-client.pl: Fails to find CFeedbackClient.pm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #411766,
regarding gnuift: man page is not a man page
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #695039,
regarding Cannot be used with graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat anymore
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #575929,
regarding gnuift-perl: package name does not adhere to naming policy for Perl
modules
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #626319,
regarding gnuift: circular dependency with gnuift-perl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #897761,
regarding gnuift: ftbfs with GCC-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #906032,
regarding FTBFS: LaTeX first run problem.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:33:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026363: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #942281,
regarding libapache2-mod-ruid2 package missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:33:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026363: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #853981,
regarding apache2-bin: mod_http2 together with mod_ruid2 breaks the server
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:33:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026363: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #866395,
regarding libapache2-mod-ruid2: Server crashes (Signal 6 aborted) with
mod_ruid2 after jessie->stretch update
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:33:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026366: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026365,
regarding golang-code.gitea-git: unmaintained go library - keep out of testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #302259,
regarding Manpage for -L option not clear where capture output ends up
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #477426,
regarding Incorrect SP (flow) setup when in tunnel mode.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #482590,
regarding isakmpd: Package a newer upstream version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #657210,
regarding Please enable hardened build flags
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #568069,
regarding sysdep_sa_len: unknown sa family (on amd64)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026367: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982830,
regarding golang-code.gitea-git: unmaintained go library - keep out of testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #970915,
regarding isakmpd: outdated upstream source unacceptable for distribution
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
bindgraph | 0.2a-6 | source, all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; RC-buggy, unmaintained, not in stable
--
Note that t
Version: 0.2a-6+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package bindgraph has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1026360
The
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
gnuift | 0.1.14+ds-1 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
gnuift-doc | 0.1.14+ds-1 | all
gnuift-perl | 0.1.14+ds-1 | all
libgnuift0-dev | 0.1.14
Version: 0.1.14+ds-1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gnuift has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1026361
T
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libapache2-mod-ruid2 |0.9.8-4 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
--- Reason ---
RoQA; rc-buggy, upstream dead
Version: 0.9.8-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package libapache2-mod-ruid2 has just been removed from the Debian
archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
golang-code.gitea-sdk | 0.0~git20171220.79eee8f-3 | source
golang-code.gitea-sdk-dev | 0.0~git20171220.79eee8f-3 | all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned; part o
Version: 0.0~git20171220.79eee8f-3+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package golang-code.gitea-sdk has just been removed from the Debian
archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http
Version: 20041012-10+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package isakmpd has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1026370
Version: 0.0~git20190411.63b74d4+ds-1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package golang-code.gitea-git has just been removed from the Debian
archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see h
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
golang-code.gitea-git | 0.0~git20190411.63b74d4+ds-1 | source
golang-code.gitea-git-dev | 0.0~git20190411.63b74d4+ds-1 | all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; unmaintain
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
isakmpd | 20041012-10 | source
isakmpd | 20041012-10+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
--- Reason ---
RoQA; obs
* Adrian Bunk :
> Source: libcommoncpp2
[..]
> src:ucommon is the successor of libcommoncpp2, and the only
> remaining build dependency on libcommoncpp2-dev in
> vdr-plugin-fritzbox is stale.
It appears all r-(build-)deps are gone. Should src:libcommoncpp2
also go away from unstable?
Chris
Source: scalc
Version: 0.2.4-6
Severity: serious
It appears src:scalc only builds a library package, and nothing in
Debian uses it. If people see value in keeping it in bookworm,
please speak up.
I'll note that there is a new, completely unrelated project using
the "scalc" name, so it might be a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 887467 important
Bug #887467 [hpanel] hpanel: x86_64 shows broken icons
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
887467: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Source: libbase58
Version: 0.1.4-5
Severity: serious
libbase58 appears to be a leaf library package - nothing else in Debian
debends on it. Apparently it was introduced for some other
bitcoin-related libraries, which are gone again.
I would suggest we waste no resources on this for bookworm. Inte
Source: mercurial-buildpackage
Version: 0.10.1+nmu2
Severity: important
It would appear mercurial-buildpackage is not useful anymore:
hg.debian.org has long been shut down, and from popcon it would seem
there are few/no users left.
Does this package still have value for bookworm?
Chris
obexftp_0.24-9_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
obexftp_0.24-9.dsc
obexftp_0.24-9.debian.tar.xz
obexftp_0.24-9_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:30:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022983: fixed in obexftp 0.24-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022983,
regarding obexftp FTCBFS: ruby not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:30:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#820188: fixed in obexftp 0.24-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #820188,
regarding obexftp: Build obexfs from obexftp package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 02:01:53 +
Source: obexftp
Architecture: source
Version: 0.24-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Chris Hofs
golang-code.gitea-sdk 0.0~git20171220.79eee8f-3 is marked for autoremoval from
testing on 2023-01-03
It is affected by these RC bugs:
1026365: golang-code.gitea-sdk: golang-code.gitea-git: unmaintained go library
- keep out of testing
https://bugs.debian.org/1026365
This mail is generated by
48 matches
Mail list logo
