Bug#526878: Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2010-03-09 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Ralf, On Saturday, 22. August 2009, Ralf Becker wrote: > Independent of how EGroupware is maintained in Debian in future, I'm > happy to work closer together with Debian Security Team, to get earlier > information about exploits in embedded code and coordinate security fixes. > > If I'm going

Bug#526491: fixed in radiusclient 0.3.2-12

2009-10-15 Thread Jan Wagner
reopen 526491 thanks Hi Barry, On Friday 09 October 2009 18:39:14 Barry deFreese wrote: >* Add Conflicts for radiusclient-ng packages. (Closes: #526491). you added "Conflicts: libradiusclient-ng-dev, libradiusclient-ng2", which is wrong! The conflicting packages are "libradiusclient-ng-dev"

Bug#526878: Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-08-22 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Ralf, On Thursday 20 August 2009, Ralf Becker wrote: > I'm one of the admins and the main developer of EGroupware project. > > Naturally I'm very interested that EGroupware stays in Debian. > > I'm building the projects own rpm packages and since a while also Debian > packages for a professiona

Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-08-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Peter, On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin Meredith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:11:29PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:39:48 Martin Meredith wrote: > > > I've suggested that I adopt this, however, the current maintainer seems &

Bug#526878: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-08-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Martin, On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:39:48 Martin Meredith wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:02:18AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > Hi everyone (formerly) interested in egroupware, > > > > egroupware seems to be in need for attention > > > > #526878 > > [egroupware-wiki] egroupware-

Bug#526878: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-07-29 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno mer, 29/07/2009 alle 09.39 +0100, Martin Meredith ha scritto: > [...] > > > I've suggested that I adopt this, however, the current maintainer seems > > to want to stay as maintainer, and just do everything through "accessible >