Package: cuneiform
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg-5
Severity: wishlist
The current upstream version is 0.9. Please package this version.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstableftp.debian.org
--- Package
Package: cuneiform
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Please do a rebuild to resolve that problem.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstableftp.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends
Source: iterm
Version: 0.5-7
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so
Source: g2
Version: 0.72-1
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so other
Source: libdockapp
Version: 1:0.5.0-3
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library
Source: knoda
Version: 0.8.3-3
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so
Source: libiphone
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package
Source: lineakd
Version: 1:0.9-6
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so
Source: zbar
Version: 0.8+dfsg-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: missing-libtool-update
I did a rebuild of all packages which are affected by bug #554821. As it seems
your package doesnt do the needed autoreconf needed for libtool. When doing
autoreconf or the needed
Source: xenwatch
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: wmfishtime
Version: 1:1.24-9.1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide
Source: wmshutdown
Version: 0.2-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: tpm-tools
Version: 1.3.3-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: ttmkfdir
Version: 3.0.9-6
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: sysprof
Version: 1.0.12-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: sweep
Version: 0.9.3-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed
Source: rvm
Version: 1.16+debian-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: rpc2
Version: 2.8+debian-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: sfftobmp
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: saods9
Version: 4.0b7-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: qsynth
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: procmeter3
Version: 3.5b-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: phat
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed
Source: poe.app
Version: 0.5.1-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: lash
Version: 0.5.4-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed
Source: libengine-tpm-openssl
Version: 0.4.1+20071221-8
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold.
Source: jack-tools
Version: 0.0.2-6
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: ivtools
Version: 1.2.6-1+nmu1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: klineakconfig
Version: 0.9-8
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: gnome-swallow
Version: 1.2-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: gapcmon
Version: 0.8.9-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: d4x
Version: 2.5.7.1-6
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed
Package: anymeal
Version: 0.30-8
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: antennavis
Version: 0.3-6
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: bsdgames
Version: 2.17-16
Severity: serious
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -
DNEW_STYLE -Iinclude -Iboggle/boggle -c boggle/boggle/bog.c -o
boggle/boggle/bog.o
In file included from
Package: adesklets
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
36 matches
Mail list logo
