Source: sendmail
Version: 8.16.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
| gcc -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werro
Source: libdigidoc
Version: 3.10.5-2
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
| [ 76%] Building C object libdigidoc/CMakeFiles/digidoc.dir/DigiDocOCSP.c.o
Hi,
wvstreams has a RC bug due to the openssl transition. There seems not to
be any upstream activity, the last commit on github was from 2011. It
has one reverse dependency which is wvdial.
wvdial itself saw its last upload in 2012. I can't reach upstream's
homepage (alumnit.ca).
I was surprised
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.15.2-11
Severity: normal
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: c_rehash
This package is using the c_rehash command which is part of the
openssl package. The c_rehash script is considered by upstream as a
fallback script and will disa
On 2017-10-13 09:06:36 [+0800], Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Pidgin-openfetion was hosted on code.google.com, which was obsoleted long ago
> without upstream activity. Pidgin-openfetion package in Debian is also
> orphaned.
>
> For QA purpose, I suggest we remove this package from Debian Archive. If
>
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Package: sendmail-base
Version: 8.15.2-8
Severity: serious
I had sendmail installed. Then I removed it including sendmail-base. I
used "apt-get remove" instead of "purge" and this did not end well. The
log was quickly filled with this:
|Sep 1 21:28:02 debbuildd dhclient[3221]: DHCPREQUEST of 172
Package: pev
Version: 0.80-3
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle.
Sebastian
Package: boxbackup
Version: 0.12~gitcf52058f-3
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle.
Sebastian
Package: yafc
Version: 1.3.7-3
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle.
Sebastian
Package: wvstreams
Version: 4.6.1-11
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle. The bug report about
the FTBFS is #828603. The log of the FTBFS can be found at
https://b
Package: vtun
Version: 3.0.3-3
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle. The bug report about
the FTBFS is #828596. The log of the FTBFS can be found at
https://breakpo
Package: turnserver
Version: 0.7.3-5
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle. The bug report about
the FTBFS is #828581. The log of the FTBFS can be found at
https://b
Control: reassign 761989 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle 761989 RM: RoQA; unmaintained, dead upstream, low popcon,
library with no rdeps
On 2017-01-17 10:16:52 [+], Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: reassign 761998 ftp.debian.org
> Control: retitle 761998 RM: RoQA; unmaintained, dead upstream,
.0. I actually spent more time writing this email than
the patch. And I would like to avoid switching B-D now and looking at it
again after the release.
> cu
> Adrian
Sebastian
>From dc21aa1a25fa59e3e667cff8487f971dd74a3d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: W
On 2016-11-28 16:49:35 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: polygraph
> Version: 4.3.2-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Control: block 827061 by -1
>
> ...
> checking for CRYPTO_lock in -lcrypto... no
> checking for CRYPTO_add_lock in -lcrypto... no
> ...
>
> Not a perfect solution but an
Y_value(subj->entries,i);
>
> I think you're looking for:
> for (i = 0; NULL != subj && i < X509_NAME_entry_count(subj); i++)
> {
> X509_NAME_ENTRY *ne = X509_NAME_get_entry(subj, i);
>
exactly. Thank you.
The patch attached sho
V2 attached. I could throw on a freebsd-* porter box
first if you want me to.
Sebastian
>From 02edb8d94682fcf13a7e98618294e06f728e66e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:27:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] sendmail: compile against openssl 1.1.0
Signe
using sendmail in stretch!
could you please try if the patch attached works? It compiles :)
> Andreas
Sebastian
>From ac5e68745e050f8e86e435994eec866718128242 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:27:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] sendmail: compil
appen in there. If HALP is turned into 0 then it compiles.
> Kurt
Sebastian
>From 58fa4e5de620b90fca7c2366a130ec73d0aee0f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:49:54 +
Subject: [PATCH] virtuoso-opensource: build against openssl 1.1.0
Signed-off
30 matches
Mail list logo
