On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 02:50:18PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> Better fixes are available, though. I'd forgotten that the last
> message in this bug left it up to me to test them ... I'll have a look
> today or tomorrow and see if we can get this sorted.
>
> -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ther
ok, written. not especially nice, but written.
http://finbar.dyndns.org/~tgs/deb/
it does not ask me the question, i'm not sure if that's because i have
my priority set to high or if it's actually broken. so, go ahead and
test... have fun, and thank you.
thomas
--
Thomas "resc" Smith <[EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:27:51AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any progress with this cgiemail bug? If you've got the debconf stuff
> written, I could test it if that would help ...
I worked on it significantly today, and will finish it tomorrow. This
is my spring break, so I finally hav
I thought of a way not to break compatability: if there's no config
file, have it act like it did before.
Here's a patch.
--- tmp/cgiemail-1.6/cgilib.c Tue Feb 12 17:09:45 2002
+++ cgiemail-1.6/cgilib.c Tue Feb 12 17:08:32 2002
@@ -475,15 +475,7 @@
cfp = fopen(TEMPLATECONF, "r");
i
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:42:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> > Hmm, one problem that just occurred to me is that we can't easily make
> > the location of the template files a compile-time option because people
&
Hello, thank you for helping/offering to help!
I had released a new version with an almost-correct fix for the buffer
overflow problem last night, and just looked at your mail to the bug
this afternoon. My fix was almost the same as yours; it used
CGI_ERRMSG_MAX-1 instead of CGI_ERRMSG_MAX. My n
6 matches
Mail list logo
