Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#125320: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 23:06:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 17:06:56 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16G6qV-0003E2-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:06:56 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
id 16G6qV-0005l5-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:06:55 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16G6qV-0002Nl-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:06:55 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rmc-binaries: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:06:55 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: rmc-binaries
Severity: minor
This is an automated bug report.
I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions. In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.
Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:
- Capitalization
The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
English. Acronyms should be in all capital letters.
- Abbreviation
In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
description. Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
This is especially important for proper keyword searches.
- Word joining
For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
to form new words, like "bugreport". While this may be acceptable
in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.
In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.
There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package. A unified diff follows at the end of this message. You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:
patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control
There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive. If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand. When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.
If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.
If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- orig/rmc-binaries Mon Dec 17 15:52:32 2001
+++ corrected/rmc-binaries Mon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
Package: rmc-binaries
Description: Remote method call
- This conintains common binaries which use librmc
+ This contains common binaries which use librmc
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 125320-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 20:21:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 14:21:51 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XT95-0000l7-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:21:51 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSyp-0004MQ-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#125320: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rmc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rmc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 20:30:04 +0000
Source: rmc
Binary: librmc-dev rmc-binaries librmc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20010628CVS-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
librmc - Remote method call
librmc-dev - Remote method call (development files)
rmc-binaries - Remote method call (common binaries)
Closes: 125026 125320 129117 130965
Changes:
rmc (20010628CVS-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Various fixes for g++-3 (closes: #129117):
- configure.in: Just check whether libstdc++ is there (by checking for
main()) rather than trying to check for cout, as there doesn't appear
to be any simple way to get 'using namespace std;' into the check.
- src/Demos/Chat/Server/Chat_s.h: Use 'friend class foo', not 'friend
foo'.
* Rewrite descriptions in proper English (closes: #125026, #125320).
* Don't use long lines in librmc's description (closes: #130965).
* Use dh_installman rather than dh_installmanpages, so that man pages
don't end up in all three binary packages. Build-depend on debhelper 3
to get this, although DH_COMPAT is still set to 2.
Files:
18cfa0d4827ccc444eced31bf1e040fa 693 libs optional rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
bb0cff15129de7b3cbdc5245bdcb766e 34396 libs optional rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
db8d8811d5f1199a0891a1a358fd31fd 40490 libs optional
librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
541203915e32553010de66ee3a32ecfe 31766 libs optional
librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
5d28fb5931d0c3c9bf3d55a43675d1e7 26110 libs optional
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Debian developer
iD8DBQE8XE2F9t0zAhD6TNERAhY9AJ4jGq29IxHflfXTSSS0mbAX6KkX7ACeMKpL
C4il40vGDtQ6nIjIkqEXo9Y=
=g4nw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
