Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#129117: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2002 04:33:38 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 13 22:33:38 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) [195.92.249.252] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16PyoU-0000k3-00; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:33:38 -0600 Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5) id 16PyoP-0000oH-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 04:33:33 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 04:33:33 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: problem persists Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: rmc Version: 20010628CVS-3.2 Severity: important *sigh*. Bug #104669 seems to have expired from the BTS, even though I can still see it on the website... (1) The version you uploaded (-3.2) is an NMU version number, not an MU number, should have been -4. (2) The interdiff between -3.1 and -3.2 is: diff -u rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog --- rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog +++ rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +rmc (20010628CVS-3.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Fixed build failure on hppa (closes: Bug#104669) + + -- Maurizio Boriani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:42:43 +0100 + rmc (20010628CVS-3.1) unstable; urgency=low * NMU which clearly is missing something :-) A new upload would be appreciated. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 129117-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 20:21:50 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 14:21:50 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16XT94-0000ky-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:21:50 -0600 Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16XSyp-0004MS-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $ Subject: Bug#129117: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rmc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive: librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rmc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 20:30:04 +0000 Source: rmc Binary: librmc-dev rmc-binaries librmc Architecture: source i386 Version: 20010628CVS-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: librmc - Remote method call librmc-dev - Remote method call (development files) rmc-binaries - Remote method call (common binaries) Closes: 125026 125320 129117 130965 Changes: rmc (20010628CVS-5) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Various fixes for g++-3 (closes: #129117): - configure.in: Just check whether libstdc++ is there (by checking for main()) rather than trying to check for cout, as there doesn't appear to be any simple way to get 'using namespace std;' into the check. - src/Demos/Chat/Server/Chat_s.h: Use 'friend class foo', not 'friend foo'. * Rewrite descriptions in proper English (closes: #125026, #125320). * Don't use long lines in librmc's description (closes: #130965). * Use dh_installman rather than dh_installmanpages, so that man pages don't end up in all three binary packages. Build-depend on debhelper 3 to get this, although DH_COMPAT is still set to 2. Files: 18cfa0d4827ccc444eced31bf1e040fa 693 libs optional rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc bb0cff15129de7b3cbdc5245bdcb766e 34396 libs optional rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz db8d8811d5f1199a0891a1a358fd31fd 40490 libs optional librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb 541203915e32553010de66ee3a32ecfe 31766 libs optional librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb 5d28fb5931d0c3c9bf3d55a43675d1e7 26110 libs optional rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Debian developer iD8DBQE8XE2F9t0zAhD6TNERAhY9AJ4jGq29IxHflfXTSSS0mbAX6KkX7ACeMKpL C4il40vGDtQ6nIjIkqEXo9Y= =g4nw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----