Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 +0000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line evas has been removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:17:11 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:17:09 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19wouh-0006WG-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:16:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 5661 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:16:33 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:16:33 +0200 From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libevas0-dev Version: 0.6.0-3 Severity: important Justification: section 2.3.3 Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states: The description should be written so that it gives the system administrator enough information to decide whether to install the package. Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs (samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X' or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as 'dpkg-iasearch'). If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list. If this package is being generated from a single source package and you already provide a full description in your control file for the main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars. This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that the package has an extended description which is only one line long. Regards Javier Fernandez-Sanguino PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread at debian-devel started by Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which is available at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html --------------------------------------- Received: (at 209805-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:27:03 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:27:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AkoyN-0004ie-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:27:03 -0800 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp id 1AkoyM-0004af-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:02 +0000 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AkoyL-0004RF-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 +0000 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 +0000 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: evas has been removed from Debian unstable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 X-Spam-Level: evas has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these bugs. ========================================================================= [Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:25:08 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone] Removed the following packages from unstable: evas | 0.6.0-5 | source evas-demo | 0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libevas0 | 0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libevas0-dev | 0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 179909 ------------------- Reason ------------------- RoQA; 1 year orphaned. Seems unimportant ---------------------------------------------- ========================================================================= Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]