On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> I'm not sure, but for me the changelog describes the history of the
> package and usually I don't change old entries ... but I'm not the
> maintainer here, so I guess he'll decide what he want to do.
But I agree that a changelog e
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh, why not? changelog entries which in retrospect fail to correctly
> describe the change, or have typo's, or whatever
I'm not sure, but for me the changelog describes the history of the
package and usually I don't change old entries ... but I
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 09:41:25PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, that I don't know what changed in that version?
>
> Nothing changed, Christian has just orphaned all his gnome packages with
> 2 uploads. One with a full sentence mad
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that I don't know what changed in that version?
Nothing changed, Christian has just orphaned all his gnome packages with
2 uploads. One with a full sentence made from all the changelog entries
(some words in changelog of each of his packa
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Into something non-silly (like "Package orphaned" or something, you
> might interdiff it to find out what changed, I don't trust this
> changelog entry to actually reflect what changed...).
Is that a really problem ? Christian did 2 uploads, one
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 09:32:38PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Into something non-silly (like "Package orphaned" or something, you
> > might interdiff it to find out what changed, I don't trust this
> > changelog entry to actually reflec
Package: gnome-control-center
Severity: minor
I saw that in the experimental 2.6.0.3-2 this wasn't yet fixed:
Please change this silly changelog entry:
control-center (1:2.4.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
* You need
7 matches
Mail list logo
