Bug#521473: getcontext missing on some architectures, what to do with wvstreams and wvdial?

2009-11-09 Thread Petr Salinger
wvstreams and wvdial because they rely on getcontext and setcontext, not available in armel and kfreebsd* implementations of eglibc (and this feature won't probably be implemented soon). Why do you think getcontext/setcontext is not available on GNU/kFreeBSD ? It is available for a very long

Bug#521473: getcontext missing on some architectures, what to do with wvstreams and wvdial?

2009-11-09 Thread Luca Falavigna
Petr Salinger ha scritto: Why do you think getcontext/setcontext is not available on GNU/kFreeBSD ? It is available for a very long time already, see i.e. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/i386/getcontext.S Oh, I probably overlooked that, so it's just armel

Bug#521473: getcontext missing on some architectures, what to do with wvstreams and wvdial?

2009-11-08 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hello Release Team, I'd like to have some guidance on how to manage bug #521473, which affects wvstreams and wvdial because they rely on getcontext and setcontext, not available in armel and kfreebsd* implementations of eglibc (and this feature won't probably be implemented soon). I was thinking

Bug#521473: getcontext missing on some architectures, what to do with wvstreams and wvdial?

2009-11-08 Thread Luk Claes
Luca Falavigna wrote: Hello Release Team, I'd like to have some guidance on how to manage bug #521473, which affects wvstreams and wvdial because they rely on getcontext and setcontext, not available in armel and kfreebsd* implementations of eglibc (and this feature won't probably be

Bug#521473: getContext()

2009-08-02 Thread Martin Algö
I can confirm this on arm as well. The wvdial error: -- Modem initialized. wvdial: utils/wvtask.cc:198: WvTaskMan::WvTaskMan(): Assertion `getcontext(get_stack_return) == 0' failed. Aborted wvdial --version: WvDial 1.60 uname -a: Linux LKGA06B66 2.6.26-1-ixp4xx #1 Sat Mar 14 08:31:13 UTC 2009

Bug#521473: getcontext()

2009-04-13 Thread Robert Millan
Note that this won't longer be a problem on mipsel soon (see #523939). It still applies to other arches though. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow