On 2009-11-02 18:36 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Sven Joachim (svenj...@gmx.de):
>
>> > So, the solution is probably adding it to Depends (or Pre-Depends? I
>> > need to check the policy about this).
>>
>> No, makedev serves absolutely no useful purpose on 99% of all Debian
>> system
Quoting Sven Joachim (svenj...@gmx.de):
> > The problem probably comes from makedev being an extra package now
> > while it was essential in the past.
>
> I cannot remember makedev ever being essential, though it used to be
> required.
Well, the result is about the same: the package maintainer s
On 2009-11-02 07:28 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Michael Prokop (m...@debian.org):
>> Package: capiutils
>> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>>
>> Fresh installation:
>>
>> [...]
>> Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4)
Quoting Michael Prokop (m...@debian.org):
> Package: capiutils
> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Fresh installation:
>
> [...]
> Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
> Setting up capiutils (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
> Note: running
Package: capiutils
Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Fresh installation:
[...]
Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
Setting up capiutils (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
Note: running MAKEDEV to create CAPI devices in /dev...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/capi
5 matches
Mail list logo
