Package: prelink
Version: 0.0.20090925-8
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?

installing new version of gnumeric

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

prelink -av

   * What was the outcome of this action?

only a newly installed binary was prelinked, not the upgraded gnumeric

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

prelinking of all new and upgraded binaries and libraries used by any binaries

I ran prelink -v $(which gnumeric) and the end of the output indicated
that a prelink was needed and took place after the explicit 
prelink -v $(which gnumeric) command:

Prelinking /usr/lib/libgoffice-0.10.so.10.0.9
Prelinking /usr/lib/libspreadsheet-1.12.9.so
Prelinking /usr/bin/gnumeric


*** End of the template - remove these lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 
'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-rc4 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages prelink depends on:
ii  execstack  0.0.20090925-8

prelink recommends no packages.

prelink suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20131216233645.31456.22313.reportbug@am64.localdomain

Reply via email to