Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2000 09:27:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 06 03:27:46 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tph17.tuwien.ac.at [::ffff:128.130.48.137]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13siZ7-0004xn-00; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 03:27:46 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tph.tuwien.ac.at)
by tph17.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13siZ5-00032I-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 10:27:43 +0100
Sender: rebhana
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 10:27:43 +0100
From: Anton Rebhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: TU Vienna
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: "switch" does not work and other problems
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xmbase-grok
Version: 1.4.3-4
The "switch" statement, when used according to the Manual,
leads to a grok session, in which only the summary is shown
and no cards can be accessed.
Moreover, it is not possible to keep the current form by
switch("",...).
By the way, the on-line help does not know about "switch",
but describes instead an equivalent "search", which is not
recognized by the parser, however.
In "Print" fields I get empty displays when using "avg(_somefield)"
or "qavg(_somefield)", but curiously the latter version starts
to work after issuing a few queries.
I also tried to form expressions using "foreach", but this
command does not seem to be recognized by the parser.
Finally, in exporting the built-in templates do not work, e.g.
the example given in the Manual:
grok -x phone html > phone.html
grok phone: failed to create HTML file
It does work, however, by duplicating the built-in html into
~.grok/phone.tm/
I suspect that some of these problems might have to do with
the lesstif1 implementation.
Installed packages that grok depends on:
ii lesstif1 0.89.4-3 OSF/Motif implementation released
under LGPL
ii libc6 2.1.3-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and
Timezone
ii xlib6g 3.3.6-10 shared libraries required by X clients
I'm running Debian 2.2 under kernel 2.2.17
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 76362-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EoHN-0005ax-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id A447526BB4; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2A68923D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg00005.html
for more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
