Processed: Re: Bug#921471: Should pdf2htmlex be removed?

2019-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 ROM: pdf2htmlex -- dead upstream Bug #921471 [pdf2htmlex] Should pdf2htmlex be removed? Changed Bug title to 'ROM: pdf2htmlex -- dead upstream' from 'Should pdf2htmlex be removed?'. > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #921471 [pdf2htmlex] ROM: pdf2htmlex --

Bug#921471: Should pdf2htmlex be removed?

2019-03-25 Thread Johannes Schauer
Control: retitle -1 ROM: pdf2htmlex -- dead upstream Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2019-03-25 22:20:36) > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:01PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:12:03 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff > > wrote: > > > Should pdf2htmle

Bug#921471: Should pdf2htmlex be removed?

2019-03-25 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:01PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:12:03 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Should pdf2htmlex be removed? It's RC-buggy for over a year and upstream > > development seems to have stopped: > > http://pdf2htmlex.blogspot.de/2016/12/looking-for

Bug#921471: Should pdf2htmlex be removed?

2019-02-05 Thread Johannes Schauer
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:12:03 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Should pdf2htmlex be removed? It's RC-buggy for over a year and upstream > development seems to have stopped: > http://pdf2htmlex.blogspot.de/2016/12/looking-for-new-maintainer.html Yes, possibly. Funny, that you are reporting this t

Bug#921471: Should pdf2htmlex be removed?

2019-02-05 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: pdf2htmlex Severity: serious Should pdf2htmlex be removed? It's RC-buggy for over a year and upstream development seems to have stopped: http://pdf2htmlex.blogspot.de/2016/12/looking-for-new-maintainer.html Cheers, Moritz