Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 ROM: pdf2htmlex -- dead upstream
Bug #921471 [pdf2htmlex] Should pdf2htmlex be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'ROM: pdf2htmlex -- dead upstream' from 'Should pdf2htmlex
be removed?'.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #921471 [pdf2htmlex] ROM: pdf2htmlex --
Control: retitle -1 ROM: pdf2htmlex -- dead upstream
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2019-03-25 22:20:36)
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:01PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:12:03 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff
> > wrote:
> > > Should pdf2htmle
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:01PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:12:03 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Should pdf2htmlex be removed? It's RC-buggy for over a year and upstream
> > development seems to have stopped:
> > http://pdf2htmlex.blogspot.de/2016/12/looking-for
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:12:03 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Should pdf2htmlex be removed? It's RC-buggy for over a year and upstream
> development seems to have stopped:
> http://pdf2htmlex.blogspot.de/2016/12/looking-for-new-maintainer.html
Yes, possibly.
Funny, that you are reporting this t
Package: pdf2htmlex
Severity: serious
Should pdf2htmlex be removed? It's RC-buggy for over a year and upstream
development seems to have stopped:
http://pdf2htmlex.blogspot.de/2016/12/looking-for-new-maintainer.html
Cheers,
Moritz
5 matches
Mail list logo