2011/5/4 Ron :
> So yes, I'm not just dumping it back in the archive and hoping someone
> else will take care of it, I am quite prepared to take responsibility
> for it if nobody else wants to do that more than I do.
Good, I'll check it again during my next scan.
Thanks for your comment, and keep
Hi Luca,
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:21:20PM +, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> despite you claim this package has been removed without providing good
> arguments, I don't think reintroducing it as it was just prior of its
> removal is a good choice. I noticed upstream seems active, so why do
Hi,
despite you claim this package has been removed without providing good
arguments, I don't think reintroducing it as it was just prior of its
removal is a good choice. I noticed upstream seems active, so why don't
provide updated version instead of an old one?
Also, why listing QA as maintaine
3 matches
Mail list logo
