Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all packages) clone 560106 -1 Bug#560106: Spellchecker: Language entries are

Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:58:27AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on

Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Mike Hommey
# For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all packages) clone 560106 -1 reassign -1 igerman98 retitle -1 Please rebuild igerman98 against latest dictionaries-common-dev clone

Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:58:27AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU

Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:22:24PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: As said on IRC, they won't break, they will possibly shown as xx_XX instead of a nice label, if the remaining file is in the xx_XX (instead of xx-XX) I define that as break, admittedly only minor, though. There was a reason why

Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:58:27AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # For the last 4

Re: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:45:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:00AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all

Re: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:00AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all packages) It's not at all clear to me what people are expected to

Re: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:45:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:00AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all