Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:43:17PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:26:33PM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:14:54AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: Why is a pure virtual build-depends a serious bug? Could you please point out the section of policy?

Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 169969 serious Bug#169969: acfax: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev Severity set to `serious'. severity 170006 serious Bug#170006: emacs20: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev Severity set to `serious'. severity 169975 serious

Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:14:54AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:48:54PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 169969 serious Bug#169969: acfax: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev Severity set to

Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-06 Thread Daniel Schepler
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:48:54PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 169969 serious Bug#169969: acfax: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev Severity set to `serious'. severity