Bug#954639: gftp: FTBFS: pty.c:65:10: fatal error: stropts.h: No such file or directory

Source: gftp Version: 2.0.19-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely due to the upgrade to glibc 2.30. >From https:/

Bug#959555: zope.interface: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'Feature' from 'setuptools' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/__init__.py)

Source: zope.interface Version: 4.7.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200501 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > fakeroot debian/rules clean >

Bug#959636: zope.i18nmessageid: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'Feature' from 'setuptools' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/__init__.py)

Source: zope.i18nmessageid Version: 5.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200501 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > fakeroot debian/rules cle

Bug#959633: zope.proxy: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'Feature' from 'setuptools' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/__init__.py)

Source: zope.proxy Version: 4.3.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200501 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > dpkg-buildpackage > --

Bug#959654: flpsed: FTBFS: (process:21444): WARNING **: 05:02:41.896: Unable to create profile directory (Permission denied) (13)

Source: flpsed Version: 0.7.3-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200501 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[4]: Entering directory '/<>' > ma

Bug#963365: sendmail: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: ul: not found

Source: sendmail Version: 8.15.2-19 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/d

Bug#963359: glhack: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not found

Source: glhack Version: 1.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/src' >

Bug#963386: tupi: FTBFS: make[2]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.

Source: tupi Version: 0.2+git08-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering directory '/<>' >

Bug#963378: xcolorsel: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not found

Source: xcolorsel Version: 1.1a-22 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering directory '/<>' >

Bug#963403: mp3info: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not found

Source: mp3info Version: 0.8.5a-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' >

Bug#964645: isakmpd: FTBFS: cc: error: Entering: No such file or directory

Source: isakmpd Version: 20041012-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200709 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.

Bug#897473: libappindicator: FTBFS: app-indicator.c:2188:28: error: assignment from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]

Source: libappindicator Version: 0.4.92-5 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/b

Bug#924838: scoop: FTBFS: Could not import extension sphinx.ext.pngmath (exception: No module named pngmath)

Source: scoop Version: 0.7.1.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20190315 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in buster on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in buster (in a buster chroot, not a sid chroot), your package failed to build on

Bug#924858: doxygen: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [doc/CMakeFiles/doxygen_pdf.dir/build.make:62: doc/CMakeFiles/doxygen_pdf] Error 1

Source: doxygen Version: 1.8.13-10 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20190315 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in buster on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in buster (in a buster chroot, not a sid chroot), your package failed to build o

Bug#971102: apvlv: FTBFS: ApvlvPdf.cc:32:10: fatal error: goo/gtypes.h: No such file or directory

Source: apvlv Version: 0.1.5+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src &&

Bug#973169: python-chameleon: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.9 3.8" returned exit code 13

Source: python-chameleon Version: 3.6.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules build > dh bui

Bug#975127: wvstreams: FTBFS: ./include/wvscatterhash.h:186:46: error: invalid use of non-static data member ‘WvScatterHashBase::xstatus’

Source: wvstreams Version: 4.6.1-15 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -c -o utils/w

Bug#975133: tupi: FTBFS: tslider.cpp:292:29: error: aggregate ‘QPainterPath path’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined

Source: tupi Version: 0.2+git08-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -c -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>

Bug#975138: simulavr: FTBFS: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Source: simulavr Version: 1.0.0+git20160221.e53413b-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/lib/gcc/avr

Bug#975144: qpdfview: FTBFS: sources/model.h:46:22: error: field ‘boundary’ has incomplete type ‘QPainterPath’

Source: qpdfview Version: 0.4.18-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-

Bug#975147: wvdial: FTBFS: wvscatterhash.h:186:46: error: invalid use of non-static data member ‘WvScatterHashBase::xstatus’

Source: wvdial Version: 1.61-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > * G

Bug#975201: glob2: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 127

Source: glob2 Version: 0.9.4.4-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > s

Bug#976586: boxbackup: FTBFS: latex undefined control sequence

Source: boxbackup Version: 0.13~~git20200326.g8e8b63c-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Re

Bug#976586: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6

[ Copying other bugs affected by new latex failures since my last rebuild ] Hi Paolo, On 05/12/20 at 18:55 +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi Lucas (is it you, or a bot?), I'm not a bot, but only noticed this message by chance. Remember that bug submitters do not receive emails sent to nnn...@bugs.

Bug#978344: spellutils: FTBFS: configure:4772: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INTL_SUBDIR (caused by gettext 0.19 -> 0.21?)

Source: spellutils Version: 0.7-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules build > dh_testdir > t

Bug#978346: gtick: FTBFS: configure:6437: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INTL_SUBDIR (caused by gettext 0.19 -> 0.21?)

Source: gtick Version: 0.5.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules build > dh build >dh_

Bug#978372: ap-utils: FTBFS: configure:5103: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INTL_SUBDIR (caused by gettext 0.19 -> 0.21?)

Source: ap-utils Version: 1.5-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules build > dh build >dh

Bug#978375: gkdebconf: FTBFS: error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.19 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.20

Source: gkdebconf Version: 2.1.0 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering directory '/<>' > M

Bug#978386: xdemorse: FTBFS: configure:5266: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INTL_SUBDIR (caused by gettext 0.19 -> 0.21?)

Source: xdemorse Version: 3.6.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > DC-Build-Header: xdemorse 3.6.2-1 /

Bug#997109: apt-xapian-index: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from ./axi-cache

Source: apt-xapian-index Version: 0.52 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > dh_auto_build > I: pybuild base:232: /usr/b

Bug#997173: procinfo: FTBFS: procinfo.cpp:214:22: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Source: procinfo Version: 1:2.0.304-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=

Bug#997183: meterec: FTBFS: display.c:474:9: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Source: meterec Version: 0.9.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/include/opus > -D

Bug#997186: nast: FTBFS: ncurses/n_nast.c:686:46: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Source: nast Version: 0.2.0-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=format-s

Bug#997198: gnomint: FTBFS: gthread.h:129:37: error: extra brace group at end of initializer

Source: gnomint Version: 1.3.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"gnoMint\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"gnomint\" > -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1

Bug#997219: codelite: FTBFS: IHunSpell.cpp:67:17: error: use of deleted function ‘std::unordered_set<_Value, _Hash, _Pred, _Alloc>::unordered_set() [with _Value = wxString; _Hash = IHunSpell::StringHa

Source: codelite Version: 14.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ZoomNavigator && /usr/bin/c++ > -DINSTALL_DIR=\"/us

Bug#997259: xgammon: FTBFS: save.c:145:60: error: ‘sys_siglist’ undeclared (first use in this function)

Source: xgammon Version: 0.99.1128-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -I./exports/include -Dlinux > -D__amd

Bug#997287: zeitgeist: FTBFS: where-clause.vala:219.35-219.63: error: The name `pdata' does not exist in the context of `GLib.PtrArray*'

Source: zeitgeist Version: 1.0.3-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/libzeitgeist' > /usr/bin/valac \ > --target-

Bug#997284: pvm: FTBFS: ddpro.c:398:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory

Source: pvm Version: 3.4.6-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -DSYSVSIGNAL -DNOWAIT3 -DRSHCOMMAND=\"/usr/bin/rsh\" -DNEEDENDIAN > -DFDSETNOTSTRUCT

Bug#997318: ifhp: FTBFS: Errors while processing: foomatic-filters sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy

Source: ifhp Version: 3.5.20-17 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > +--+ > | I

Bug#997402: kst: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None -DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=/etc -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LOCALSTATEDIR=/va

Source: kst Version: 2.0.8-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering director

Bug#997434: xpaint: FTBFS: -q: invalid option -- '.'

Source: xpaint Version: 2.9.1.4-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering dir

Bug#997510: webauth: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: webauth Version: 4.7.0-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]: Entering dire

Bug#997531: extra-xdg-menus: FTBFS: rmdir: failed to remove '/<>/debian/extra-xdg-menus/usr/@DATADIRNAME@/': No such file or directory

Source: extra-xdg-menus Version: 1.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enterin

Bug#997542: libguess: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: CPP@: not found

Source: libguess Version: 1.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[8]: Entering direc

Bug#997611: wnn6-sdk: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once

Source: wnn6-sdk Version: 1.0.0-18 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[5]: Entering di

Bug#997622: kinput2: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once

Source: kinput2 Version: 3.1-13 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering direc

Bug#997643: ctwm: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once

Source: ctwm Version: 3.7-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory

Bug#998487: glogic: FTBFS: configure.ac:12: error: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE expanded multiple times

Source: glogic Version: 2.6-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binary > dh

Bug#998508: deb-gview: FTBFS: configure.ac:25: error: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE expanded multiple times

Source: deb-gview Version: 0.2.11.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binar

Bug#998530: python-jenkinsapi: FTBFS: Unable to create file /sbuild-nonexistent/.cache/pylint/jenkinsapi.views1.stats: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/sbuild-nonexistent/.cache/pylint/jenkinsap

Source: python-jenkinsapi Version: 0.3.11-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: En

Bug#998917: swish++: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: swish++ Version: 6.1.5-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requir

Bug#998931: crip: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: crip Version: 3.9-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by

Bug#998929: stfl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: stfl Version: 0.22-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required b

Bug#998941: glbsp: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: glbsp Version: 2.24-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required

Bug#998960: scribus-template: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: scribus-template Version: 1.2.4.1-3 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. Thi

Bug#998964: sgml-base-doc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: sgml-base-doc Version: 1.99.2+nmu1 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This

Bug#998988: dbmix: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: dbmix Version: 0.9.8-8 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required

Bug#999010: apsfilter: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: apsfilter Version: 7.2.6-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requ

Bug#999014: playmidi: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: playmidi Version: 2.4debian-11 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is

Bug#999024: fbpager: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: fbpager Version: 0.1.5~git20090221.1.8e0927e6-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debia

Bug#999030: hashcash: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: hashcash Version: 1.21-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requir

Bug#999050: cldump: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: cldump Version: 0.11~dfsg-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is req

Bug#999066: tmexpand: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: tmexpand Version: 0.1.2.0-4.1 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is r

Bug#999071: docbook-simple: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: docbook-simple Version: 1.1-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is r

Bug#999080: stymulator: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: stymulator Version: 0.21a~dfsg-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This i

Bug#999088: kic: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: kic Version: 2.4a-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by

Bug#999115: esekeyd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: esekeyd Version: 1.2.7-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requir

Bug#999117: triangle: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: triangle Version: 1.6-3 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is require

Bug#999122: lgrind: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: lgrind Version: 3.67-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required

Bug#999138: xstarfish: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: xstarfish Version: 1.1+ds-1 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is req

Bug#999166: snmptrapfmt: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: snmptrapfmt Version: 1.17 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requi

Bug#999167: cfingerd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: cfingerd Version: 1.4.3-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requi

Bug#999184: osdclock: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: osdclock Version: 0.5-24 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requir

Bug#999243: iog: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: iog Version: 1.03-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by

Bug#999250: wnn7egg: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: wnn7egg Version: 1.02-9 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is require

Bug#999252: efax: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: efax Version: 1:0.9a-20 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is require

Bug#999253: ncdt: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: ncdt Version: 2.1-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by

Bug#999255: poppassd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: poppassd Version: 1.8.5-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requi

Bug#999264: libapache2-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: libapache2-mod-encoding Version: 20040616-6 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/ru

Bug#999281: xfonts-bolkhov: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: xfonts-bolkhov Version: 1.1.20001007-8.2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules

Bug#999288: pppconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: pppconfig Version: 2.3.25 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requi

Bug#999298: galib: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: galib Version: 1:2.4.7-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is requir

Bug#999304: quickml: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: quickml Version: 0.7-6 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required

Bug#999311: convlit: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: convlit Version: 1.8-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required

Bug#999316: xgammon: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: xgammon Version: 0.99.1128-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is re

Bug#999323: libapache-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: libapache-mod-encoding Version: 0.0.20021209-11 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debia

Bug#999326: sntop: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: sntop Version: 1.4.3-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required

Bug#999298: galib: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Hi Fabio, is is still useful to keep it in Debian, or should it be removed? Lucas On 10/11/21 at 00:36 +, Fábio Roberto Teodoro wrote: > I want to help. But don't know what to do. I've made this package and > submitted the ITP in 2008. Haven't listen about it until today. So I think > the

Bug#999534: python-bayespy: FTBFS with matplotlib 3.5 (in experimental): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

Source: python-bayespy Version: 0.5.18-3 Severity: important Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-matplotlib35 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64, using matplotlib 3.5 currently in experimental. This v

Bug#1002085: clipit: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (ayatana-appindicator3-0.1 >= 0.2.4) were not met

Source: clipit Version: 1.4.4+git20190202-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking wh

Bug#1002196: python-kaptan: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13

Source: python-kaptan Version: 0.5.10-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules b

Bug#1002202: pyocd: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'

Source: pyocd Version: 0.13.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering

Bug#1002221: apt-dpkg-ref: FTBFS: dvips: DVI file can't be opened: apt-dpkg-ref.dvi: No such file or directory

Source: apt-dpkg-ref Version: 5.3.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering d

Bug#1002276: schroot: FTBFS: The following tests FAILED: 3 - sbuild-chroot-config (Failed)

Source: schroot Version: 1.6.10-12 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering di

Bug#1002360: zope.exceptions: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13

Source: zope.exceptions Version: 4.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules bu

Bug#1006073: xine-lib-1.2: FTBFS: dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting

Source: xine-lib-1.2 Version: 1.2.11-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > dh_installdocs -plibxine2 -plibxine2-consol

Bug#1007047: dnprogs: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

Source: dnprogs Version: 2.65 Severity: wishlist Tags: bookworm sid Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-kp-nv Dear maintainer, This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many advantages, as documente

Bug#1007309: mrtg-ping-probe: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

Source: mrtg-ping-probe Version: 2.2.0-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: bookworm sid Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv Dear maintainer, This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many advantages,

Bug#1007315: proxsmtp: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

Source: proxsmtp Version: 1.10-2.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: bookworm sid Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv Dear maintainer, This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many advantages, as doc

Bug#1007372: sanitizer: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

Source: sanitizer Version: 1.76-5.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: bookworm sid Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv Dear maintainer, This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many advantages, as do

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >