Hi,
Didn't we agree to remove the debian-qa-private mailing list?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> it does not make sense to have debian-qa-private as list for communication
> between qa comittee and members as an ultra-secret cabal thing. Thus
> qa-private is not private right now and everybody can subscribe there.
Yes. The "pr
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 09:34:57PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > Also I'm suprised how often in the current report you can read the tag
> > > > > "Maintainer was contacted on Dec 12, awaiting reply".
> > >
> > > > This is dark[1]'s work, he had a mass-mailing event on that date, as
> > >
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:29:23PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > Also I'm suprised how often in the current report you can read the tag
> > > "Maintainer was contacted on Dec 12, awaiting reply".
>
> > This is dark[1]'s work, he had a mass-mailing event on that date, as
> > the release manage
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 10:29:48PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Also I'm suprised how often in the current report you can read the tag
> "Maintainer was contacted on Dec 12, awaiting reply".
This is dark[1]'s work, he had a mass-mailing event on that date, as
the release manager, to officially c
Hi guys,
I've made some changes to the layout and contents of the QA web pages,
http://qa.debian.org/
Please, visit them, comment, bitch, flame, whatever you feel is
appropriate... I do reserve the right to ignore you if you get too
violent ;)
I've arranged with gecko (Darren Benham) th
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 12:46:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Package: libg++272 (main)
> > > Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 47212 [m68k] libg++272_2.7.2.8-1 build failure
> >
> > Here we need the help from the M68K-Team to find the bug and a solution
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 11:03:16AM +1100, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> It's kind of difficult to test them because I don't have root access to an
> alpha machine, and gnucash has about a billion dependencies which I need
> to get installed.
There is an easier way. You locate the list of your package's sour
Hi,
I really think you should adopt hwtools.
It is a troublesome package. It builds from different sources, some of which
are unmaintained upstream, some OTOH release frequently. It deals with
hardware, sometimes on low level. I don't even want to think how hard would
it be to maintain this packa
Hi people,
I've done some preliminary redesign actions regarding our web pages.
The result is at http://qa.debian.org/ , of course :)
I'm open to everyone's (well, not quite everyone's ;) ideas about
getting it to look better.
Raphael, I've made it use WML better, by adding a general template,
wh
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 08:31:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Vincent is not moderator of debian-qa-private and as such not yet
> > ~
> > ITYM subscriber? Or is this a read-only list for some, and read-write for
> > the committee members?
>
> Yes debian-qa-private
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 11:55:29PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > You might be subscribed to it :)
> >
> > BTW am I wrong, or is this list (on the web site) wrong:
>
> Vincent is not moderator of debian-qa-private and as such not yet
~
ITYM subscriber? Or is this a r
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 09:40:19PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 09:52:08AM +, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > [NB: debian-qa-private? never heard about this list before...]
>
> You might be subscribed to it :)
BTW am I wrong, or is this list (on the
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 09:52:08AM +, Vincent Renardias wrote:
>
> [NB: debian-qa-private? never heard about this list before...]
You might be subscribed to it :)
BTW this may or may not be the right time to say it, but the page
at http://www.debian.org/distrib/ contains some information on
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 03:40:16PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > your package libtiff3 still depends on libjpegg6a which isn't available
> > > > anymore. So a recompilation is needed to fix the package. Could you
> > > > please do this or let me know if an NMU is okay for you?
> > >
> > > A
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 11:03:56PM -0700, Guy Maor wrote:
> > your package libtiff3 still depends on libjpegg6a which isn't available
> > anymore. So a recompilation is needed to fix the package. Could you
> > please do this or let me know if an NMU is okay for you?
>
> An NMU is fine with me. In
16 matches
Mail list logo
