Re: Gregory Stark

2001-09-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 03:39:55PM +0200, Mikael Andersson écrivait: > > Mikael, would you be interested in taking over some of the packages ? > > Yes, the kerberos4kth packages. I have already taken the arla packages > (wish he had orphaned). Well, wait an answer from Martin Michlmayr, but I gu

Re: Gregory Stark

2001-09-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Mikael Andersson écrivait: > I have tried to get in contact with Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> since > mid of Jun, but still no success. I have asked on debian-private, but no > one else have told me that the have succeded in contacting him. Looking a

Re: Anyone seen Robert Edmonds?

2001-05-14 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:17:12AM -0500, Taral écrivait: > He ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) hasn't been seen for nearly a month and a half > now, and no reply to my emails... Hi, we have now a new system to manage MIA developers. When you try to contact a developer that you think is MIA, you cc mia-@qa.de

Re: Release-Critical Bug in darxite

2000-03-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 11:04:19PM +0100, Christian Kurz écrivait: > there's an open RCB in your package darxite and a patch in the BTS. Do > you release a fixed version of would you allow me please to make a NMU > to fix the bug? He asked me yesterday night to upload his package, I'll do it today

Re: BugSquash Party this sunday || xinetd adoption

2000-01-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 11:53:15AM -0500, Michael Stone écrivait: > I'm in the same boat with opie. I'd like to release a package that would > allow the use of one time passwords with our pam'd apps, but someone > already has a package based on the opie source. (And that person has > apparantly dis

Re: BugSquash Party this sunday

1999-12-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ CCed to Darren in order to let him know my intention to NMU the perl package in order to correct most of the RCB ] Le Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 03:43:35PM +0100, Christian Kurz écrivait: > Because from the information which I got from Torsten Landschoff who > took part on one of it. And after the "su

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999

1999-11-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 01:11:19PM +0100, Christian Kurz écrivait: > > don't have time ATM to investigate it extremely carefully. > > Okay, I crosspost this mail to the debian-qa-private list, so that > someone from the debian-qa-team will look at this issue ASAP and help > you with fixing this bu

Re: debian-qa-private list, web pages on QA

1999-11-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 04:04:07PM +0100, Josip Rodin écrivait: > > Vincent is not moderator of debian-qa-private and as such not yet > ~ > ITYM subscriber? Or is this a read-only list for some, and read-write for > the committee members? Yes debian-qa-private is a public

Re: debian-qa-private list, web pages on QA

1999-11-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 10:56:32PM +0100, Josip Rodin écrivait: > > You might be subscribed to it :) > > BTW am I wrong, or is this list (on the web site) wrong: Vincent is not moderator of debian-qa-private and as such not yet a member of the QA committee. But if he wants to join, I have no pro

Re: mia?

1999-10-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 08:36:36PM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait: > > > Sue Campbell > > > Galen Hazelwood > > I got replies that these people, at least, are gone. So do we have a > method for dealing with this? What's the next step after someone's > identified as absent? Get the list of packages

Re: another question

1999-10-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait: > Sorry for being the annoying new guy. I promise to shut up once I get > oriented... Has anyone talked to galen hazelwood? I sent a query to him I don't think so. > a couple of days ago and haven't heard anything. I'm a little co

Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 06:46:24AM +0200, Christian Kurz écrivait: > c for the rest. So the load has also been divided but you don't need > first to read another mail-folder to take appropriate action against That Maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] can maintain abiword and lintian which would be contact

Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 06:34:02AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait: > Well, the reason I thought of a seperate address is that I assumed most > people don't want to read every piece of correspondence--it only needs > to be available for reference. Well the QA committee is (should be) an active commi

Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 05:26:58PM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait: > Ok. How about this as a mechanism for coordinating work: create an > address like [EMAIL PROTECTED] that can be cc'd on any queries sent to > maintainers. People working on QA could consult the mailbox attached to > that address to

Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ CC to the QA committee for information ] Le Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 03:04:37PM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait: > I'm interested in contributing to this effort--let me know what I can do > to help. Different tasks have to be done : First task : finding bad maintainers --