Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-05 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 06:34:09AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: ["bad" maintainers] > I could also help in this task as sometimes I have some free time and > looking over those information would be possible in my (at the moment) > spare time for Debian QA. So if Michael is interested in doing this

Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-06 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:04:02AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 05:26:58PM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait: > > Ok. How about this as a mechanism for coordinating work: create an > > address like [EMAIL PROTECTED] that can be cc'd on any queries sen

Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-07 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 06:46:24AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > the firm an back) it would make QA much harder. So I would prefer > creating little team that coordinate themself like: Person a looks at > the bugs for packages a-i, person b for bugs in packages j-r and person > c for the rest. So

Re: new maintainer *must* reopen

1999-10-08 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 07:12:26AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > I think, that Raphael made a good suggestion. Make a division by the > name of the maintainers would be good, to avoid that you wrote two > emails two a maintainer and then I write three to the same one. If you > are still interested

procedural question

1999-10-08 Thread Michael Stone
I've got someone who'd like to give a bug to qa (19423). Looks fairly simple. How does he do that? Mike Stone

another question

1999-10-08 Thread Michael Stone
Sorry for being the annoying new guy. I promise to shut up once I get oriented... Has anyone talked to galen hazelwood? I sent a query to him a couple of days ago and haven't heard anything. I'm a little concerned about fileutils (seems like a fairly important package.) There are three rcb's, the o

Re: mia?

1999-10-20 Thread Michael Stone
> > Sue Campbell > > Galen Hazelwood I got replies that these people, at least, are gone. So do we have a method for dealing with this? What's the next step after someone's identified as absent? Mike Stone pgpZ6w26HtsSE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [QA] Package maintainence status?

1999-11-14 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 05:41:04PM -0400, you wrote: > There are some long-standing unanswered bugs against some of your > packages, and two important bugs. Do you have plans for addressing > these? If not, have you considered orphaning the packages? I haven't had any luck contacting you, and quer

Re: [QA] Package maintainence status?

1999-11-14 Thread Michael Stone
I've got bugs on the mind...this was supposed to be cc'd to qa-private Mike Stone - Forwarded message from Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 14:52:37 -0500 To: "Michael J. Booth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mai

Re: BugSquash Party this sunday || xinetd adoption

2000-01-04 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 05:12:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > I'm pondering of adopting xinetd, because I find the program very useful, > and the package not finished. However, its maintainer hasn't contacted us > for months now, and he has takedn part in some other dubious activities > (contact m