Hi. I'm preparing a koffice-i18n upload ATM so we can get it into sarge
before things start to freeze.
Based on the latest discussion regarding package splitting with
kde-i18n, my initial plan is to simply upload 30 different
koffice-i18n-foo binary packages plus an additional koffice-i18n
metap
On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:28, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Uh I thought I sent a 'hello list' letter, but it never made it through,
> that or I am in some moderator's queue right now. So hi again, maybe.
>
> Anywho, qt 3.2 build now produces libqt-mt.la and libqt.la and l
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
> > /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor
> > -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings
> > -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -DNDEBUG
> > -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno
> > one thing I forgot in my last mail - is the c102 stings in the
> > packages still required or is the gcc transition over so those can
> > be removed safely now and go back to the original package names ?
> >
> AIUI it will be needed until the soname is changed, i.e. Qt 4.0
This is correct.
On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 14:53, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:30, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:14, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> > > > - moved .qmake.cache build files to the -dev packages under
> > > > /usr/share/ qt3/.qmake.cache
> > >
> > > Uh? What
On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:30, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:14, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> > > - moved .qmake.cache build files to the -dev packages under /usr/share/
> > > qt3/.qmake.cache
> >
> > Uh? What files were changed for this?
>
> I just checked and I saw that you
On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:28, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Uh I thought I sent a 'hello list' letter, but it never made it through,
> that or I am in some moderator's queue right now. So hi again, maybe.
>
> Anywho, qt 3.2 build now produces libqt-mt.la and libqt.la and l
On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:14, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> > - moved .qmake.cache build files to the -dev packages under /usr/share/
> > qt3/.qmake.cache
>
> Uh? What files were changed for this?
I just checked and I saw that you didn't take over that change. Change debian/
rules:
# in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey folks,
Uh I thought I sent a 'hello list' letter, but it never made it through, that
or I am in some moderator's queue right now. So hi again, maybe.
Anywho, qt 3.2 build now produces libqt-mt.la and libqt.la and libqt-mt.la
seems to be neede
On Sonntag, 31. August 2003 13:14, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> Content-Description: signed data
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > while doing a regular backport of qt-3.2.1-1 to woody for the next KDE
> > release I found that my original diff missed a de
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi,
>
> while doing a regular backport of qt-3.2.1-1 to woody for the next KDE
> release
> I found that my original diff missed a dependency to xcursor-dev - sorry I
> forgot about that.
>
> Martin:
On Aug 31, 2003 at 11:36, Ralf Nolden praised the llamas by saying:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi,
>
> one thing I forgot in my last mail - is the c102 stings in the packages still
> required or is the gcc transition over so those can be removed safely now and
> go back to the original p
Hi,
one thing I forgot in my last mail - is the c102 stings in the packages still
required or is the gcc transition over so those can be removed safely now and
go back to the original package names ?
Ralf
--
We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs.
--
Hi,
while doing a regular backport of qt-3.2.1-1 to woody for the next KDE release
I found that my original diff missed a dependency to xcursor-dev - sorry I
forgot about that.
Martin: it would be also cool if you could add the changes I made in the
diff.gz I sent you to the changelog file, su
14 matches
Mail list logo
