kdelibs-bin_3.5.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdelibs/kdelibs-bin_3.5.0-2_i386.deb
kdelibs-data_3.5.0-2_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kdelibs/kdelibs-data_3.5.0-2_all.deb
(new) kdelibs-dbg_3.5.0-2_i386.deb extra libdevel
debugging symbols for kdelibs
This package contains the debugging symbols associat
kdelibs_3.5.0-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kdelibs_3.5.0-2.dsc
kdelibs_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz
kdelibs_3.5.0-2.diff.gz
kdelibs_3.5.0-2_all.deb
kdelibs-data_3.5.0-2_all.deb
kdelibs4-doc_3.5.0-2_all.deb
kdelibs-bin_3.5.0-2_i386.deb
kdelibs4c2a_3.5.
Excuse me but I'm finally not so sure.
I send the mentionned mail to your address (I'm not comfortable with putting
it online) so you can look at it.
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry, it seems the header is wrong.
I didn't know that otherwise I would have checked.
I think you can close the bug.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
> I use the term diffusion list but the diffusion address is similar to
> a normal one and I don't understand why kmail behaves differently
> with it.
A mail can have different headers, in particular one for where to post an
answer, an one that mailing lists use.
The behaviour
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.4.3-1
Severity: important
I use kmail for my e mails and I experienced a bug which I consider
important.
I'm a student.
I received a mail from a teacher which was send to all the students by
an address like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and I answered it
by the kmail answer fu
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 22:21 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 December 2005 15:19, Jeremy Laine wrote:
> > I noticed there is a patch in the Debian of qt-x11-free ...
> ...
> In other news, doxygen [1] Is failing to a similar issue. Jeremy, can you
> issue a patch for that too? Looks like
Package: kde
Followup-For: Bug #340986
Two packages are missing when installing kde:
kdeaddons: is not present in the package list.
kde-amusements, wich requires kdeedu wich requires kig wich requires
libboost-python1.33.0. However, only
libboost-python1.32.00 is available.
-- System Informat
Accepted:
karbon_1.4.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/karbon_1.4.2-5_i386.deb
kchart_1.4.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/kchart_1.4.2-5_i386.deb
kformula_1.4.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/kformula_1.4.2-5_i386.deb
kivio-data_1.4.2-5_all.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/kivio-data_1.
koffice_1.4.2-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice_1.4.2-5.dsc
koffice_1.4.2-5.diff.gz
koffice_1.4.2-5_all.deb
koffice-doc-html_1.4.2-5_all.deb
kivio-data_1.4.2-5_all.deb
koffice-data_1.4.2-5_all.deb
karbon_1.4.2-5_i386.deb
kchart_1.4.2-5_i
Accepted:
karbon_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/karbon_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
kchart_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/kchart_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
kformula_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/kformula_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
kivio-data_1.4.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice/kivio-data_1.
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342888: fixed in koffice 1:1.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342294: fixed in koffice 1:1.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
koffice_1.4.2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice_1.4.2-4.dsc
koffice_1.4.2-4.diff.gz
koffice_1.4.2-4_all.deb
koffice-doc-html_1.4.2-4_all.deb
kivio-data_1.4.2-4_all.deb
koffice-data_1.4.2-4_all.deb
karbon_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
kchart_1.4.2-4_i
14 matches
Mail list logo
