kde-workspace_4.11.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kde-workspace_4.11.5-1.dsc
kde-workspace_4.11.5.orig.tar.xz
kde-workspace_4.11.5-1.debian.tar.xz
kde-workspace_4.11.5-1_all.deb
kdebase-workspace_4.11.5-1_all.deb
binary:libkwinglesutils1 is NEW.
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 23.01.2014 18:57, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
I've tried to summarize the current arm64 situation. The following are my
conclusions, feel free to point if something is wrong, give more
info/feedback, etc.
As you know from
+++ Marcin Juszkiewicz [2014-01-27 17:41 +0100]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 23.01.2014 18:57, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
I've tried to summarize the current arm64 situation. The following are my
conclusions, feel free to point if something is
On Monday 27 January 2014 17:41:26 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
[snip]
- It uses linux-g++ instead of linux-g++-64. While that could be the best
fit, it would be good to know why.
Maybe it is because linux-g++ may use '-m64' argument for GCC which
AArch64 does not support so build fails.
W dniu 27.01.2014 19:20, Wookey pisze:
+++ Marcin Juszkiewicz [2014-01-27 17:41 +0100]:
- It uses linux-g++ instead of linux-g++-64. While that could be the best
fit,
it would be good to know why.
Maybe it is because linux-g++ may use '-m64' argument for GCC which
AArch64 does not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 27.01.2014 19:14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
So what we are currently missing should be:
- The copyright and license of the qatomic stuff.
Author: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
License: same as upstream one
-BEGIN PGP
On Monday 27 January 2014 19:32:43 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 27.01.2014 19:14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
So what we are currently missing should be:
- The copyright and license of the qatomic stuff.
Author: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
License: same as
On Monday 27 January 2014 19:29:04 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
[snip]
Are QT4 patches going to be accepted at some point or will distros have
to carry an arm64 patch for QT4 as long as it remains supported?
Ask in https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35442 please
I'll take care of
On Monday 27 January 2014 18:20:21 Wookey wrote:
[snip]
Qt4 patches are not accepted upstream. All new code has to go to Qt5 and
since 5.2.0 QAtomics stuff is using std::atomic so compiler takes care
of it and there is no code for separate architectures.
Are QT4 patches going to be
On Monday 27 January 2014 22:32:01 Wookey wrote:
[snip]
Wookey: are there any arm64 porterboxes available? I can't promise
anything, but maybe at some point I could help...
Not yet. No. And I don't yet know when there might be. 'In time for
Jessie, hopefully' is the only clue I've had so
11 matches
Mail list logo
