Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

El domingo, 29 de julio de 2018 22:45:38 -03 John David Anglin escribió: > On 2018-07-29 4:53 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Looking again the call to llvm-config seems to not be fatal, so it should > > be as simple as doing something like it's already done in the dh_install >

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

On 2018-07-29 4:53 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Looking again the call to llvm-config seems to not be fatal, so it should be as simple as doing something like it's already done in the dh_install override for archs without qt webview. Yes.  I had a successful build on hppa

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

El domingo, 29 de julio de 2018 14:11:41 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escribió: > Hi Dave! > > El domingo, 29 de julio de 2018 11:46:32 -03 John David Anglin escribió: > > Here is log for an attempted build on hppa with Adrian's patch: > >

Bug#904948: kate is not installable

Package: kate Version: kate Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, kate is not installable, as many other KDE packages (calibre convertall gwenview hplip-gui k3b k4dirstat konqueror konsole krename kstars kubrick okular pyzo qarte soundkonverter spyder systemsettings). Here is the interesting part

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

On 07/29/2018 09:12 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Interesting, I have always used them inside the binary itself[1]. > > [1] > > But thanks to your comment I noted that indeed one can keep the resource file > out of

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

On 2018-07-29 2:39 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I have my doubts that it's actually not possible to separate the QDoc building from compiling the actual C++ code. It appears to me from the build log that the install needs to be modified when qdoc isn't built. It seems unlikely that it

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

El domingo, 29 de julio de 2018 15:39:51 -03 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz escribió: > On 07/29/2018 07:11 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Adrian: I have just remembered that there is actually a case in which > > building documentation can be rightfully in a binary build: when it's

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

On 07/29/2018 07:11 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Adrian: I have just remembered that there is actually a case in which > building > documentation can be rightfully in a binary build: when it's embedded in the > application itself by using Qt's resources system. That's

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

Hi Dave! El domingo, 29 de julio de 2018 11:46:32 -03 John David Anglin escribió: > Here is log for an attempted build on hppa with Adrian's patch: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qttools-opensource-src=h > ppa=5.11.1-3=1532832160=0 As expected, as it is a hard dependency. So

Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures

Here is log for an attempted build on hppa with Adrian's patch: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qttools-opensource-src=hppa=5.11.1-3=1532832160=0 Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net