Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional contributor to Debian's reproducible builds, and noticed
a recent reproducib
Followup-For: Bug #1059592
Description: helpgenerator: populate FileAttributeSetTable in sorted attribute
ID order.
Author: James Addison
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1059592
---
qttools-opensource-src-5.15.10.orig/src/assistant/qhelpgenerator/helpgenerator.cpp
+++
qttools-opensource
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Version: 5.15.2-3
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timezone
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Looking at some recent Reproducible Build[1] test results[2] for the Debian
openorienteeri
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 15:30:58, I wrote:
> Inspecting the patch from #875847 and the values that appear in the diffoscope
> output from the build logs: the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH value of the bu
fact that
only the main.cpp code site was confirmed affected.
Description: helpgenerator: clear UTC offset to zero when reading
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH value
Author: James Addison
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1059631
---
qttools-opensource-src-5.15.10.orig/src/assistant/help
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
Control: forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/527972
Hi Dmitry,
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 22:50:47, Dmitry wrote:
> Thank you for the patch!
>
> Any chance you can forward it to upstream Qt?
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Followup-For: Bug #1059592
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Please note: it appears that a fix[1] that addresses this same problem is
already included in v6.5.0 of qttools.git upstream.
[1] - https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/416699
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
> Control: forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/527972
This fix has been merged upstream; I've also offered what I think is a further
cleanup[1], but it does not affect the behaviour of the code (only readability
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
Hi Dmitry - could you recommend whether there's anything I should do next for
this bug?
As context: the patch was accepted upstream, but with modifications that make
it cleaner for Qt6.6 albeit in a non-5.15.x compatible way. I realize
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:01:40 +0300, Dmitry wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:40:35PM +0000, James Addison wrote:
> [ ... snip ... ]
> > My sense is that with the patch here and also the patch from #1059592
> > app
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Version: 5.15.10+dfsg-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch security
Dear Maintainer,
Security advisory CVE-2024-25580, a buffer overflow affecting KTX image
handling in QT, has been announced[1], and the announcement includes patches
for various versions of QT including th
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Followup-For: Bug #1064056
Control: forcemerge 1064053 -1
Duplicate of #1064053; force merging this bugreport into that one.
Followup-For: Bug #1064052
Control: fixed -1 6.6.2+dfsg-1
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Followup-For: Bug #1064053
Control: found -1
Control: found -1 5.12.2+dfsg-1
Replying to set the earliest version affected from the advisory blogpost[1],
and to (re)attach the patch from the duplicate bugreport.
[1]
https://www.qt.io/blog/security-advisory-potentia
Source: qtbase-opensource-src-gles
Followup-For: Bug #1064054
Control: found -1 5.12.2+dfsg-1
Control: tags -1 patch
diff --git a/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp b/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
index 0d98e97453..6a79e55109 100644
--- a/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
+++ b/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
@@
Source: kget
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: buildpath
Dear Maintainer,
The Salsa CI configuration for kget sets customized[1] command-line options for
'reprotest'[2], a utility used to find pac
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Currently, Debian's buildd and also the Reproducible Builds team's testing
infrastructure[1] both use a fixed build path when building binary packages.
This means that your package will pass current reproducibility tests; however
we believe that var
Followup-For: Bug #1026062
Control: reassign -1 libpackagekitqt5-1 1.1.0-1
Control: retitle -1 packagekit-qt: use-after-free in PackageKit::Transaction
Control: affects -1 kded5
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit-Qt/issues/42
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Followup-For: Bug #1000955
Control: severity -1 normal
A summary of a side-discussion between Filippo and myself about this bug:
* Although the bug doesn't appear reproducible today, the cause hasn't been
confirmed.
* We both agreed that it makes sense for bugs to continue to stay open u
Package: libkf5globalaccel-bin
Followup-For: Bug #1000955
X-Debbugs-Cc: lopi...@debian.org
Hi Filippo,
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 12:12:44 +0100, Filippo wrote:
> Should I install other packages to fix the problem? What can I do to help?
Two ideas related to this part of your report:
> Note that I also
20 matches
Mail list logo
