Hi,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> please, I would like to decouple two issues.
>
> - Issue 1: the Debian menu is superseded in major destkotop environments, and
>the Policy should recognise that the Debian menu is not the lead mechanism
>for managing menus in Debian anymore. Unfortutately we
Charles Plessy wrote:
> On the other hand, it is the spirit of Debian to accept low-maintenance
> patches
> (in that case, menu entries) when it can help other projects even if one does
> not care for it. In that sense, if the Debian Menu has an active user base,
> it
> would be counter-product
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I believe we are at the point that we should be recommending a preference
> for the fdo MIME interfaces
Yep, and menus, too.
Do we have clear advice about
(1) how to write a menu entry for my console app (or niche graphical
app) without cluttering the menus us
Hi terminal emulator authors (in bcc),
There is a policy proposal to clarify what
x-terminal-emulator -e
does when there is one argument and when there are many arguments.
Currently policy says:
| To be an `x-terminal-emulator', a program must:
|* Be able to emulate a DEC VT100 te
1.1.11-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * xdm.init: do not start xdm if the word "text" is found in /proc/cmdline.
+
+ -- Jonathan Nieder Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:46:55 -0600
+
xdm (1:1.1.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Joe Hansen ]
diff --git a/debian/xdm.init b/debian/xdm.init
index 4127dffe
Jack Saunders wrote:
> Reversing the KDE upgrade is going to be a bit of a monumental task, so I
> won't go down that route. Debian are doing an archive upgrade on their
> servers today so that puts the kybosh on it in any case.
>
> What I did do last night is install the Gnome desktop from the cu
Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> Fixed according to comments.
Thanks, both!
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110829154641.gb2...@elie.gate
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Care to elaborate?
As I understand it:
The Qt 3 part is a red herring. Bugs blocking removal of Qt 3 really
should _not_ be release critical as long as there is someone willing
to maintain Qt 3 itself. I'm not aware of an RFA, so...
As for the KDE 3 part: to avoid user
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:11:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> 1. lower the severity of these bugs to important or lower
>
> Yes please.
Based on response from #debian-qt-kde that was a bad idea on
my part. Not wanting to spam people further, I&#
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Tags: moreinfo
Hi,
There seems to be some interest in removing kde3 and qt3 before wheezy
is released. This bug is meant to track that process and request
removal of those packages from testi
Hi!
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Work on that direction has already started some time ago, when Eckhart sent
> those wishlist mails to the maintainers of the related packages.
>
> Please, see http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and
> http://wiki.debian.org/qt3-x11-freeRemo
Package: kde
Version: kde4libs/4:4.4.5-2
Severity: minor
Justification: cosmetic
Hi,
Stock experimental i386 system. I recently installed okular + all
packages it recommends to check out a bug. Now in my latest dpkg run:
| # cupt --no-auto-remove install iceweasel
[...]
| The following 1 packa
Robert Luberda wrote:
> On 11.01.2011 09:27, Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> * The registered documentation is very sparse. It is not obvious
>> where any given kind of information is to be found (the categories are
>> especially unhelpful and I suspect something more faceted
Package: qt4-dev-tools
Version: 4:4.7.1-1
Severity: minor
Justification: cosmetic/warning
$ assistant
Object::connect: No such signal HelpViewer::printRequested()
The assistant itself works fine (aside from bug#606073). Still,
thought you might like to know.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
tags 606073 + upstream
forwarded 606073 http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-13608
quit
Romain Bossart wrote:
> qt assistant does not format the docs using css. The menus and
> generally the formating looks broken. Googling around gave a similar
> bug in ubuntu:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad
Package: qt4-qmake
Version: 4:4.6.2-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
In a directory with some source files, when I run “qmake -project” (or
“qmake-qt4 -project” explicitly), I get
$ qmake -project
QFileInfo::absolutePath: Constructed with empty filename
$ echo $?
0
The result is a reasonable project f
16 matches
Mail list logo
