This bug can be closed. No longer an issue with KDevelop 5.6.2.
Fixed in KDevelop git commit fa83c76b133a52c8ce0e7af0aa8c060fadaa8536
Background:
Debian and Ubuntu (and others?) have unique clang --version output.
KDevelop tries a few different ways to determine the clang include directory.
I dug into the source. I can see where another guess at the path could be made
or one of the existing 3 could be loosened up to match the output of Debian's
clang-11 --version output.
Details:
In KDevelop source: plugins/clang/duchain/clanghelpers.cpp
QString ClangHelpers::clangVersion(){
Oops... ignore the llvm-config solution I posted earlier.
I discovered that creating:
sudo ln /usr/bin/llvm-config-11 /usr/bin/llvm-config
Allows KDevelop to work properly.
So maybe an update-alternatives could be involved or just link(s) set up during
the install of llvm.
Justin Jones
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my
Erik Esterer wrote:
There are a few minor typos in the package desription part of the control
file.
A patch (against the control file in experimental) to fix these typos is
included.
There are a couple more than you noticed.
--- a/debian/control 2013-05-07 11:45:47.806452323 +0200
+++
Justin B Rye wrote:
There are a couple more than you noticed.
Oops, and I sent mine too soon, too.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
diff -ru kdeartwork-4.8.4.pristine/debian/control
Package: karbon
Version: 2.4.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'm glad to see the package descriptions for the KOffice^WCalligra
suite are being maintained; but there are still a few typos and other
language problems, especially in the description for karbon.
Package: calligra
[...]
Sune Vuorela wrote:
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting David Prévot (dav...@altern.org):
Please avoid “Qt 4” in short description of user-oriented packages, as
advised in the Developer's Reference, and prefer something like
“multimedia framework for KDE”.
I agree that not having KDE written
Modestas Vainius wrote:
+ [...] The following Phonon
+ backend packages seem to be available for this system at the moment:
As long as we can trust the detection (what does this depend on?)
phonon-backends provide 'phonon-backend' virtual package.
Yes, and I don't see any non-free or
(My patch goes along with the request to revert to Type: note.)
Christian PERRIER wrote:
+_Description: Missing backend for Phonon
The spelling backend is developerese - the standard English spelling
is back end (and it's not that dictionaries are lagging behind
normal usage; see e.g.
Package: konqueror-nsplugins
Version: 4:4.4.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I've been running through the package lists looking for outdated
descriptions that no longer fulfill the requirement (in Debian Policy
3.4) that package descriptions should convey to readers why they might
want to have
Christian Perrier wrote:
Your review should be sent as an answer to this mail.
Luckily enough I didn't see anything worth complaining about in the
control file, once I'd got my head round the fact that kdelibs5
provides libraries for KDE 4.
_Description: Stop possible unsafe upgrade of KDE4
Sune Vuorela wrote:
Full NACK. You are changing the message. We are not moving from .kde to
.kde4.
Oops, I missed that. Revised patch with from ~/.kde4 to ~/.kde
attached.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this
() () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#35 0xb7f1af40 in kdemain () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit4_plasma-desktop.so
#36 0x080485b2 in _start ()
(gdb)
Justin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: kdebase
Version: 4.2.4-1
Distribution: 32-bit/testing
After an apt-get dist-upgrade a few days ago (testing) and cleaning up
several hundred old packages, the thumb/tack on the top left corner of the
theme I am using is now black, is there a specific package that handles
this icon
black, is there a specific package that handles this
icon within the theme, or?
Probably an issue I caused(?) which package missing would cause this?
See attached or check the image here: (3.5KiB)
http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20090810/xterm.png
Justin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
this package to this version?
Justin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sáb 25 Abr 2009 07:41:06 Justin Piszcz escribió:
Package: kwin
Version: 3.5.10.dfsg.1-2
It is not compiled with XINERAMA support so all of the windows do not
appear properly when using multiple monitors.
A version
This fixes the problem for now until a new version of kwin is release
w/xinerama support.
Justin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-2
Severity: normal
After setting PreselectUser=None, a user was still preselected. It
was necessary to [re]move /var/lib/kdm/kdmsts to avoid username
preselection.
So it seems that PreselectUser=None fails to work as advertized:
# None - do not
reassign 444251 kompare
severity 440945 important
forcemerge 440945 444251
thanks
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:16:01AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: bash
Version: 3.1dfsg-8
Severity: important
As bash completion doesn't work anymore on my box, I was trying to
reconfigure bash,
Package: kdebase-bin
Version: 3.5.2-2+b1
Severity: important
File: /etc/pam.d/kscreensaver
I didn't make this change, so I should not be prompted about it. I
couldn't reproduce it, though, so I'm not filing it as bug..
Preparing to replace kdebase-bin 4:3.5.2-1 (using
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Ven 19 Mai 2006 15:33, Justin Pryzby a ??crit :
Package: kdebase-bin
Version: 3.5.2-2+b1
Severity: important
File: /etc/pam.d/kscreensaver
I didn't make this change, so I should not be prompted about it. I
couldn't
a noninteractive rm.
Justin
On Friday 19 May 2006 09:33, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: kdebase-bin
Version: 3.5.2-2+b1
Severity: important
File: /etc/pam.d/kscreensaver
I didn't make this change, so I should not be prompted about it. I
couldn't reproduce it, though, so I'm not filing
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:27:53PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Ven 19 Mai 2006 18:06, Justin Pryzby a ??crit :
You can actually avoid the conffile prompt, though it may not be
worth it since I think that think doesn't affect stable upgrades
(dpkg, by definition handles conffile content
and libc-2.3.5
Thanks!
Justin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kmail
Severity: minor
These four man pages:
/usr/share/man/sh/man1/kmail_antivir.1.gz
/usr/share/man/sh/man1/kmail_clamav.1.gz
/usr/share/man/sh/man1/kmail_fprot.1.gz
/usr/share/man/sh/man1/kmail_sav.1.gz
...are apparently filed under /sh/ because they're documenting shell
scripts.
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We
amd64? This
is sarge-ignore if the other 64 bit archs work.
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
possible.
Steps to reproduce? What were you doing at the time? Can you confirm
that ssh worked immediately before KDE hung the system?
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.2.2-1
Severity: minor
Missing manpages: keditbookmarks, kfmclient, konqueror
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc1
module is not loaded
automatically. This will then create this /dev/input/mice for you. After
that XFree should load up without problems. So the problem really isn't with
XFree itself, but the modules that get loaded with the new kernel.
Hope this helps,
Justin T
32 matches
Mail list logo
