Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-31 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting David Prévot (dav...@altern.org): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 27/03/2011 07:59, Justin B Rye a écrit : [...] But yes, maybe we should consider changing all of them to something more purely descriptive like Qt 4 multimedia framework. I'll put that in my

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-31 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 31 March 2011 06:53:48 Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting David Prévot (dav...@altern.org): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 27/03/2011 07:59, Justin B Rye a écrit : [...] But yes, maybe we should consider changing all of them to something more purely

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-31 Thread Justin B Rye
Sune Vuorela wrote: Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting David Prévot (dav...@altern.org): Please avoid “Qt 4” in short description of user-oriented packages, as advised in the Developer's Reference, and prefer something like “multimedia framework for KDE”. I agree that not having KDE written

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-31 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk): On the other hand, given that Qt 4 is there in the long description, you don't really need it in the synopsis. Yes. And that's not really helpful to people who browse package lists, imho. (just like foo bar written in Perl). I replaced QT 4

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-30 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 27/03/2011 07:59, Justin B Rye a écrit : [...] But yes, maybe we should consider changing all of them to something more purely descriptive like Qt 4 multimedia framework. I'll put that in my new patch too. Please avoid “Qt 4” in short

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-27 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On antradienis 22 Kovas 2011 14:02:37 Justin B Rye wrote: + If you wish to restore full Phonon multimedia capabilities, you + should install a real Phonon backend. The following Phonon + backend packages seem to be available for this system at the moment: As long as we can trust

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-27 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, by the way, I get: E: phonon: description-starts-with-package-name with the latest (2 mails above) control. -- Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-27 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Modestas Vainius (mo...@debian.org): s/behaviour/behavior/ Are we using American English in Debian? In Debian overall, here's no such high consistency. However, in Smith reviews, we settled for en_US spelling, yes (the rationale being that it appeared to be used more often than

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-27 Thread Justin B Rye
Modestas Vainius wrote: + [...] The following Phonon + backend packages seem to be available for this system at the moment: As long as we can trust the detection (what does this depend on?) phonon-backends provide 'phonon-backend' virtual package. Yes, and I don't see any non-free or

[RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-22 Thread Christian PERRIER
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for the phonon source package. This review will last from Tuesday, March 22, 2011 to Friday, April 01, 2011. Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original files. Comments about your proposed changes

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-22 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On antradienis 22 Kovas 2011 08:23:23 Christian PERRIER wrote: I think that error is more well suited for this warning I disagree. Warning is not an error by definition. It is not wrong to have phonon-backend-null installed if you know what you are doing and you are doing this

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-22 Thread Justin B Rye
(My patch goes along with the request to revert to Type: note.) Christian PERRIER wrote: +_Description: Missing backend for Phonon The spelling backend is developerese - the standard English spelling is back end (and it's not that dictionaries are lagging behind normal usage; see e.g.

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

2011-03-22 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Modestas Vainius (mo...@debian.org): I disagree. Warning is not an error by definition. It is not wrong to have phonon-backend-null installed if you know what you are doing and you are doing this intentionally. As I made some changes to prefer phonon-backend-null whenever