Re: Bug#310490: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-30 Thread astronut
On 5/28/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, this works: > > aptitude markauto libqt3 > perl -pi -e's/stable/sarge/' /etc/apt/sources.list > apt-get update > aptitude dist-upgrade Except it doesn't. I attempted this on the full system (vmware), as opposed to the smaller test c

Bug#310873: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-28 Thread Christopher Martin
On May 28, 2005 15:47, Bill Allombert wrote: > After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache, > but also the following: > > 1) debootstrap woody > > 2) Install the following packages: > konqueror aptitude libqt3 libhtml-tree-perl libapt-pkg-perl libft-perl > > 3) point apt

Re: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages? > After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache, > but

Re: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490. > > > This show a pure woody system that cann

Re: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-28 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Bill, > > I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages? After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache, but also the following: 1) debootstrap woody 2) Install the following pac

Re: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-28 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490. > > > This show a pure woody system that cannot be upgraded to sarge > > using the recommended way witout basically

Re: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-27 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages? > > I know KDE upgrade tests had been done at one point. Maybe someone on the > KDE team can shed light on this problem? At one point a kdelibs3-bin package was

Re: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-27 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490. > > > This show a pure woody system that cannot be upgraded to sarge > > using the recommended way witout basically

Re: A Prisonner of the dependency hell

2005-05-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Bill, On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490. > This show a pure woody system that cannot be upgraded to sarge > using the recommended way witout basically removing KDE. > This bug is 100% reproducible, but I have not y